IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v35y2018i3p1533-1577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditors’ Joint Engagements and Audit Quality: Evidence from Italian Private Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Pietro A. Bianchi

Abstract

This study examines the effect of auditors’ collaboration in joint audit engagements on knowledge transfer, auditor expertise, and audit outcomes. I employ a unique sample of Italian private companies whose financial statements are jointly audited by three individual auditors and use measures from the network literature to capture the intensity of interactions between these auditors. I find a positive association between several audit quality proxies and auditors’ collaboration in multiple joint engagements. My results suggest that auditors develop knowledge and contacts through collaboration which potentially leads to higher audit quality. Overall, my findings suggest that joint engagements facilitate knowledge transfer and increase auditor expertise. L'auteur étudie l'incidence de la collaboration des auditeurs dans le cadre des missions d'audit conjointes sur la transmission des connaissances, la compétence de l'auditeur et les résultats de l'audit. Il emploie un seul échantillon de sociétés italiennes à capital fermé dont les états financiers sont soumis à l'audit conjoint de trois auditeurs différents, et il utilise des indicateurs tirés de la documentation relative aux réseaux sociaux pour évaluer l'intensité des interactions entre ces auditeurs. L'auteur relève l'existence d'un lien positif entre plusieurs variables substituts à la qualité de l'audit et la collaboration des auditeurs dans le cadre de multiples missions conjointes. Les résultats de l’étude paraissent indiquer que les auditeurs enrichissent leurs connaissances et qu'ils étendent leurs relations grâce à la collaboration, ce qui est susceptible d'améliorer la qualité de l'audit. Dans l'ensemble, les observations de l'auteur tendent à indiquer que les missions conjointes facilitent la transmission des connaissances et accroissent la compétence des auditeurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pietro A. Bianchi, 2018. "Auditors’ Joint Engagements and Audit Quality: Evidence from Italian Private Companies," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 1533-1577, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:3:p:1533-1577
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12327
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Averhals, Liesbeth & Van Caneghem, Tom & Willekens, Marleen, 2020. "Mandatory audit fee disclosure and price competition in the private client segment of the Belgian audit market," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Patrick Velte, 2023. "The impact of external auditors on firms’ financial restatements: a review of archival studies and implications for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 959-985, September.
    3. Causholli, Monika & Floyd, Theresa & Jenkins, Nicole Thorne & Soltis, Scott M., 2021. "The ties that bind: Knowledge-seeking networks and auditor job performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    4. Athavale, Manoj & Guo, Zhaorui & Meng, Yun & Zhang, Tianshu, 2022. "Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 554-571.
    5. Mohamed M. El-Dyasty & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Multiple audit mechanism, audit quality and cost of debt: empirical evidence from a developing country," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 264-281, September.
    6. Kristina Peštović & Nikola Milicevic & Nenad Djokic & Ines Djokic, 2021. "Audit Service Quality Perceived by Customers: Formative Modelling Measurement Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Jeffrey L. Hoopes & Kenneth J. Merkley & Joseph Pacelli & Joseph H. Schroeder, 2018. "Audit personnel salaries and audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1096-1136, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:3:p:1533-1577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.