IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/canjec/v35y2002i2p257-281.html

Vertical product differentiation and the import demand function: theory and evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Jim Malley
  • Thomas Moutos

Abstract

In this paper we use a model of vertical product differentiation to cast doubt on the general validity of the import demand function as specified in macroeconomic models. The empirical importance of our theoretical concerns is then established. According to our first hypothesis, the share of a good’s imports in total imports is non‐increasing in domestic wages if the country has comparative advantage in high‐quality varieties of this good. The second hypothesis states that the share of a good’s imports is increasing in non‐wage domestic income if the country has comparative advantage in high‐quality varieties of this good. JEL Classification: F4, F41 Différenciation verticale des produits et fonction de demande d’importations : théorie et résultats. Dans ce mémoire, les auteurs utilisent un modèle de différenciation verticale des produits pour jeter certains doutes sur la validité générale de la fonction de demande d’importations telle que spécifiée dans les modèles macroéconomiques. L’importance empirique de ces malaises théoriques est étudiée à l’aide de deux hypothèses. La première hypothèse suggère que la part d’un bien dans les importations totales d’un pays ne va pas croître quand les salaires du pays s’accroissent si le pays a un avantage comparatif dans les variétés de haute qualité de ce bien. La seconde hypothèse suggère que la part d’un produit qui provient de l’importation croît quand le revenu intérieur non‐salarial s’accroît si le pays a un avantage comparatif dans les variétés de haute qualité de ce bien. On observe des résultats qui donnent un support empirique ferme à ces deux propositions en analysant les données en provenance de l’Allemagne, du Japon et des Etats‐Unis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jim Malley & Thomas Moutos, 2002. "Vertical product differentiation and the import demand function: theory and evidence," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 257-281, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:canjec:v:35:y:2002:i:2:p:257-281
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-5982.00130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5982.00130
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-5982.00130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malley, Jim & Moutos, Thomas, 2006. "Do excessive wage increases raise imports?: Theory and evidence," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 194-220, March.
    2. Antonis Adam & Thomas Moutos, 2023. "Do Public Sector Employment Reductions Promote Informality?," CESifo Working Paper Series 10614, CESifo.
    3. Margarita Katsimi & Thomas Moutos, 2005. "Inequality and Relative Reliance on Tariffs: Theory and Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 1457, CESifo.
    4. Eugenia Fotoniata & Thomas Moutos, 2013. "Product Quality, Informality, and Child Labor," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 268-283, May.
    5. Antonis Adam & Thomas Moutos, 2002. "The Political Economy of EU Enlargement: Or, Why Japan is not a Candidate Country?," CESifo Working Paper Series 704, CESifo.
    6. Muhammad Ahad & Talat Afza & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2017. "Financial Development and Estimation of Import Demand Function in Pakistan: Evidence from Combined Cointegration and Causality Tests," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 118-131, February.
    7. Margarita Katsimi & Thomas Moutos, 2010. "Inequality and the Relative Reliance on Tariffs," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 121-137, February.
    8. Antonis Adam & Margarita Katsimi & Thomas Moutos, 2012. "Inequality and the import demand function," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 64(4), pages 675-701, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F4 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance
    • F41 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Open Economy Macroeconomics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:canjec:v:35:y:2002:i:2:p:257-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5982 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.