IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v19y2023i1ne1309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communication skills training for improving the communicative abilities of student social workers: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Reith‐Hall
  • Paul Montgomery

Abstract

Background Good communication is central to effective social work practice, helping to develop constructive working relationships and improve the outcomes of people in receipt of social work services. There is strong consensus that the teaching and learning of communication skills for social work students is an essential component of social work qualifying courses. However, the variation in communication skills training and its components is significant. There is a sizeable body of evidence relating to communication skills training therefore a review of the findings helps to clarify what we know about this important topic in social work education. We conducted this systematic review to determine whether communication skills training for social work students works and which types of communication skills training, if any, were more effective and lead to the most positive outcomes. Objectives This systematic review aimed to critically evaluate all studies which have investigated the effectiveness of communication skills training programmes for social work students. The research question which the review posed is: ‘What is the effectiveness of communication skills training for improving the communicative abilities of social work students?’ It was intended that the review would provide a robust evaluation of communication skills training for social work students and help explain variations in practice to support educators and policy‐makers to make evidence‐based decisions in social work education, practice and policy. Search Methods We conducted a search for published and unpublished studies using a comprehensive search strategy that included multiple electronic databases, research registers, grey literature sources, and reference lists of prior reviews and relevant studies. Selection Criteria Study selection was based on the following characteristics: Participants were social work students on generic (as opposed to client specific) qualifying courses; Interventions included any form of communication skills training; eligible studies were required to have an appropriate comparator such as no intervention or an alternative intervention; and outcomes included changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills and behaviours. Study selection was not restricted by geography, language, publication date or publication type. Data Collection and Analysis The search strategy was developed using the terms featuring in existing knowledge and practice reviews and in consultation with social work researchers, academics and the review advisory panel, to ensure that a broad range of terminology was included. One reviewer conducted the database searches, removing duplicates and irrelevant records, after which each record was screened by title and abstract by both reviewers to ensure robustness. Any studies deemed to be potentially eligible were retrieved in full text and screened by both reviewers. Main Results Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, findings indicate that communication skills training including empathy can be learnt, and that the systematic training of social work students results in some identifiable improvements in their communication skills. However, the evidence is dated, methodological rigour is weak, risk of bias is moderate to high/serious or incomplete, and extreme heterogeneity exists between the primary studies and the interventions they evaluated. As a result, data from the included studies were incomplete, inconsistent, and lacked validity, limiting the findings of this review, whilst identifying that further research is required. Authors’ Conclusions This review aimed to examine effects of communication skills training on a range of outcomes in social work education. With the exception of skill acquisition, there was insufficient evidence available to offer firm conclusions on other outcomes. For social work educators, our understanding of how communication skills and empathy are taught and learnt remain limited, due to a lack of empirical research and comprehensive discussion. Despite the limitations and variations in educational culture, the findings are still useful, and suggest that communication skills training is likely to be beneficial. One important implication for practice appears to be that the teaching and learning of communication skills in social work education should provide opportunities for students to practice skills in a simulated (or real) environment. For researchers, it is clear that further rigorous research is required. This should include using validated research measures, using research designs which include appropriate counterfactuals, alongside more careful and consistent reporting. The development of the theoretical underpinnings of the interventions used for the teaching and learning of communication skills in social work education is another area that researchers should address.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Reith‐Hall & Paul Montgomery, 2023. "Communication skills training for improving the communicative abilities of student social workers: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:1:n:e1309
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brandy R. Maynard & Michael R. Solis & Veronica L. Miller & Kristen E. Brendel, 2017. "Mindfulness‐based interventions for improving cognition, academic achievement, behavior, and socioemotional functioning of primary and secondary school students," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-144.
    2. Emma Reith‐Hall & Paul Montgomery, 2019. "PROTOCOL: Communication skills training for improving the communicative abilities of student social workers: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), September.
    3. Shannon Kugley & Anne Wade & James Thomas & Quenby Mahood & Anne‐Marie Klint Jørgensen & Karianne Hammerstrøm & Nila Sathe, 2017. "Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 1-73.
    4. Montgomery, Paul & Belle Weisman, Clio, 2021. "Non-financial conflict of interest in social intervention trials and systematic reviews: An analysis of the issues with case studies and proposals for management," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanjeev Sharma & Renu Popli & Sajjan Singh & Gunjan Chhabra & Gurpreet Singh Saini & Maninder Singh & Archana Sandhu & Ashutosh Sharma & Rajeev Kumar, 2024. "The Role of 6G Technologies in Advancing Smart City Applications: Opportunities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-53, August.
    2. Howard White & Bianca Albers & Marie Gaarder & Hege Kornør & Julia Littell & Zack Marshall & Christine Mathew & Terri Pigott & Birte Snilstveit & Hugh Waddington & Vivian Welch, 2020. "Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    3. Martin Polak & Norbert Tanzer & Per Carlbring, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Effects of virtual reality exposure therapy versus in vivo exposure in treating social anxiety disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    4. Chris O'Leary & Rob Ralphs & Jennifer Stevenson & Andrew Smith & Jordan Harrison & Zsolt Kiss & Harry Armitage, 2024. "The effectiveness of abstinence‐based and harm reduction‐based interventions in reducing problematic substance use in adults who are experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic re," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    5. Heather MacDonald & Cozette Comer & Margaret Foster & Patrick R. Labelle & Scott Marsalis & Kate Nyhan & Zahra Premji & Morwenna Rogers & Ryan Splenda & Claire Stansfield & Sarah Young, 2024. "Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.
    6. Eduardo González‐Cabañes & Trinidad Garcia & Catherine Chase & Jose Carlos Núñez, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Problem solving before instruction (PS‐I) to promote learning and motivation in child and adult students," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    7. Ajay Kumar & Sushil Kumar & Komal & Nirala Ramchiary & Pardeep Singh, 2021. "Role of Traditional Ethnobotanical Knowledge and Indigenous Communities in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Kylie Burke & Cassandra K. Dittman & Elana J. Forbes & Elizabeth Eggins, 2021. "PROTOCOL: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating the impact of parenting programmes for parents of adolescents (10–18 years) on adolescent mental health outco," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), March.
    9. Johannes Burdack & Wolfgang I. Schöllhorn, 2022. "Cognitive Enhancement through Differential Rope Skipping after Math Lesson," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Hugh Waddington & Ada Sonnenfeld & Juliette Finetti & Marie Gaarder & Denny John & Jennifer Stevenson, 2019. "Citizen engagement in public services in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A mixed‐methods systematic review of participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) initiatives," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1-2), June.
    11. Julie Birkenmaier & Brandy Maynard & Hannah Shanks & Harly Blumhagen, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Medical‐financial partnerships for improving financial and health outcomes for lower‐income Americans: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    12. Joseph Lee Betts & Elizabeth Eggins & Ned Chandler‐Mather & Doug Shelton & Haydn Till & Paul Harnett & Sharon Dawe, 2022. "Interventions for improving executive functions in children with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD): A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), December.
    13. Hugh Waddington & Jennifer Stevenson & Ada Sonnenfeld & Marie Gaarder, 2018. "PROTOCOL: Participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) to improve public services in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-69.
    14. Justus J. Randolph & Anaya Bryson & Lakshmi Menon & David K. Henderson & Austin Kureethara Manuel & Stephen Michaels & debra leigh walls rosenstein & Warren McPherson & Rebecca O'Grady & Angeline S. L, 2023. "Montessori education's impact on academic and nonacademic outcomes: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    15. Julia H. Littell & Sarah Young & Therese D. Pigott & M. Antonia Biggs & Trine Munk‐Olsen & Julia R. Steinberg, 2024. "PROTOCOL: Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    16. Etienne Lwamba & Shannon Shisler & Will Ridlehoover & Meital Kupfer & Nkululeko Tshabalala & Promise Nduku & Laurenz Langer & Sean Grant & Ada Sonnenfeld & Daniela Anda & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2022. "Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    17. Iago Portela-Pino & Myriam Alvariñas-Villaverde & Margarita Pino-Juste, 2021. "Socio-Emotional Skills as Predictors of Performance of Students: Differences by Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-11, April.
    18. Julie Birkenmaier & Brandy Maynard & Youngmi Kim, 2022. "Interventions designed to improve financial capability: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    19. Nina T. Dalgaard & Anja Bondebjerg & Rasmus Klokker & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt & Jens Dietrichson, 2022. "Adult/child ratio and group size in early childhood education or care to promote the development of children aged 0–5 years: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    20. Kiran M. Sarma & Sarah L. Carthy & Katie M. Cox, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Mental disorder, psychological problems and terrorist behaviour: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:1:n:e1309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.