Author
Listed:
- Sean R. Valentine
- Connie Bateman
- Sanjay Goel
Abstract
In support of positively aligned ethics infrastructures, employers utilize ethics programs to advance work environments that improve individual attitudes and behaviors. There is reason to believe that ethics infrastructures should be strengthened by multiple programs representing multiple ethics orientations, but this notion of plurality is underexplored in business ethics research. This study uniquely draws from the pluralistic theory of ethics program orientations, its principle of requisite variety, and the concept of decoupling to better understand ethics infrastructures in firms. Using a convenience sample of employees working for organizations primarily located in the Upper Midwest region of the United States, this study explored the collective impact of four ethics program orientations, reflected across perceived ethics practices utilized and ethics communication frequency, on employees' perceptions of corporate ethical values and their overall positive work attitudes. The results of the mediation analysis indicated that perceptions of ethics programs were associated with stronger perceived corporate ethical values and a more positive work attitude. This suggests firms focus on a variety of ethics program orientations when selecting ethical practices and communication efforts to enhance employees' ethical perceptions and attitudes, thus preventing the decoupling of the ethics infrastructure from employee outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Sean R. Valentine & Connie Bateman & Sanjay Goel, 2026.
"Perceptions of Ethics Programs and Corporate Ethical Values and a Positive Work Attitude: An Application of Pluralistic and Decoupling Frameworks,"
Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 2328-2344, July.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:2328-2344
DOI: 10.1111/beer.70033
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:2328-2344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.