IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i3p2293-2304.html

Enacting Stakeholder Responsibility: Insights From a Structured Healthcare Program

Author

Listed:
  • Simone R. Barakat
  • Andrew C. Wicks

Abstract

Companies have traditionally been called upon to be responsible for their impact on stakeholders. However, little attention has been given to stakeholders' responsibility toward organizations and other stakeholders. While it is essential to hold firms accountable for the impact of their activities and for their role in the value creation process, neglecting the role of stakeholder responsibility results in a partial and potentially misleading view of how value is created. To contribute to this discussion and better understand how stakeholder responsibility is enacted in practice, we conducted an in‐depth empirical study of a structured program in a healthcare organization. Drawing on case‐based research, we found that stakeholder responsibility is enacted through specific organizational practices that support the dimensions of reciprocity, interdependence, and accountability. Building on this foundation, we extend existing theory and advance the concept of stakeholder responsibility by proposing a fourth dimension: shared commitment to a common purpose. Our study contributes to narrowing the gap between normative and empirical approaches in stakeholder theory and emphasizes the importance of incorporating multiple stakeholders' perspectives to better understand how value is created in organizational settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone R. Barakat & Andrew C. Wicks, 2026. "Enacting Stakeholder Responsibility: Insights From a Structured Healthcare Program," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 2293-2304, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:2293-2304
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.70036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.70036
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.70036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:2293-2304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.