IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i3p2279-2292.html

The Impact of Organizational Culture on Corporate Tax Avoidance

Author

Listed:
  • Hiep Ngoc Luu
  • Dung Thuy Thi Nguyen
  • Dung Duc Doan

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of different dimensions of organizational culture on corporate tax avoidance. We use textual analysis to quantify the different organizational culture dimensions of firms in conjunction with those proposed in the Competing Values Framework, including Control‐, Collaborate‐, Compete‐, and Create‐oriented cultural dimensions. We find that firms with a Control‐oriented culture that values safety and predictability are less likely to be involved in tax avoidance. By contrast, firms with a Compete‐oriented culture that encourages risk‐taking and aggressive behavior are more likely to avoid paying tax. Smaller firms primarily drive the impact of organizational culture. Our results are robust to a battery of sensitivity analyses. Overall, these results provide novel evidence about the real effects of different dimensions of organizational culture on corporate tax avoidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiep Ngoc Luu & Dung Thuy Thi Nguyen & Dung Duc Doan, 2026. "The Impact of Organizational Culture on Corporate Tax Avoidance," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 2279-2292, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:2279-2292
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.70034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.70034
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.70034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:2279-2292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.