IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i3p2179-2186.html

Borrowing Short to Lend Long: Fraudulent or Not? Elements Missing From the Current Debate

Author

Listed:
  • David Sutton
  • Ashraf M. Ismail
  • Hamza Almustafa

Abstract

There has been a long‐running debate conducted between two pairs of Austrian School economists concerning the legitimacy of borrowing short to lend long (BSLL). Barnett and Block take the view that the practice amounts to fraud. Their fellow “Austrians,” Bagus and Howden argue that, while risky, the practice is not fraud. Barnett and Block state that BSLL can lead to the Austrian Business Cycle (ABC), in which mal‐investment transforms booms into bubbles, ending in crashes. This inquiry seeks to contribute to the debate, addressing currently neglected issues. These issues involve reconfiguring the debate for consistency between the protagonists' central truth claims, elevating risk‐taking behavior as the crucial determinative factor of market failures, including certain macro‐prudential implications, and concluding that BSLL is not inherently fraudulent. The debate is essentially an ethical one, in which a basic understanding of fraud must be agreed.

Suggested Citation

  • David Sutton & Ashraf M. Ismail & Hamza Almustafa, 2026. "Borrowing Short to Lend Long: Fraudulent or Not? Elements Missing From the Current Debate," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 2179-2186, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:2179-2186
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.70031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.70031
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.70031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:2179-2186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.