IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i3p1410-1428.html

ESG, ESG Disagreement and Maturity Mismatch Between Investment and Financing: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Tao
  • Linghao Zhang
  • Yiwen Ma

Abstract

This study investigates how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, as well as disagreement in ESG ratings, influences the maturity mismatch between corporate investment and financing (MMIF). Our findings show that firms with higher ESG scores exhibit a lower degree of MMIF, suggesting that better ESG practices help alleviate maturity mismatches. However, inconsistencies in ESG evaluations across rating agencies reduce this beneficial effect. Further analysis indicates that disagreement among ESG ratings diminishes the ability of high ESG scores to relax financing constraints, which is identified as a critical mechanism for ESG's impact on MMIF. The moderating impact of ESG disagreement is especially significant for firms in regions with less banking competition, those with greater information asymmetry, and non‐state‐owned enterprises. In addition, our results indicate that environmental and governance components are the main driving factors. These findings highlight the necessity of considering both ESG performance and disagreements in ESG assessments when evaluating firms' investment and financing activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Tao & Linghao Zhang & Yiwen Ma, 2026. "ESG, ESG Disagreement and Maturity Mismatch Between Investment and Financing: Evidence From China," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 1410-1428, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:1410-1428
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12851
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12851?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:1410-1428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.