IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i3p1361-1376.html

Avoiding Corporate Greenwashing? Sustainability Silence Narratives in the Agri‐Food Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Boiral
  • Marie‐Christine Brotherton
  • David Talbot
  • Laurence Guillaumie

Abstract

The aim of this article is to shed more light on the reasons underlying companies' under‐communication or lack of communication to stakeholders about sustainability achievements in the agri‐food sector. A qualitative study based on 34 semi‐structured interviews with respondents from this sector shows the predominance of a rationale of sustainability silence and a high level of stakeholders' mistrust concerning the information publicly available in this area. The results of the study also show that sustainability silence is closely linked to the ambiguities inherent in communication on complex issues and the resulting risks that this communication will be perceived as greenwashing. The article contributes to the emerging literature on the rationale of organizational sustainability silence and proposes an integrative model to better understand its implications. Drawing on neo‐institutional theory and the theory of ambiguity, it also contributes to the literature on the congruence of sustainability communication and on the greenwashing practices of agri‐food organizations by questioning the intentional character of companies' lack of transparency concerning their actions and performance in this area. Managerial implications and avenues for future research are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & David Talbot & Laurence Guillaumie, 2026. "Avoiding Corporate Greenwashing? Sustainability Silence Narratives in the Agri‐Food Industry," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 1361-1376, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:1361-1376
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12847
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:1361-1376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.