IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i2p1279-1304.html

Exploring Tolerance Towards Corruption in the European Union Through Experienced Corruption, Perceived Corruption and Institutional Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Begoña Alvarez‐García
  • Dolores Lagoa‐Varela
  • Susana Iglesias‐Antelo
  • Jorge Gallud Cano

Abstract

Corruption is a major problem that undermines the foundations of democracy and reduces citizens' trust in institutions. However, even in the world's most advanced countries, citizens accept certain levels of corruption. This tolerance towards corruption (TC) reduces the impact of anti‐corruption actions and ends up giving a patina of normality to some corrupt behaviour. Therefore, lowering TC is an important challenge to be faced in the fight against corruption. However, TC is an understudied phenomenon in the literature, with three main gaps: (1) TC has more often been approached as an explanatory variable for other phenomena than as a central variable in the analysis, (2) most of the research studying TC focused on a single country and a single period, which only shows a narrow and static view of the problem and (3) studies are more concerned with knowing the impact of individuals' socio‐demographic characteristics on TC than on understanding how their experience of corruption or their personal perceptions of it may affect it. This paper addresses these gaps by analysing, for the 27‐EU countries over the period 2013–2022, the extent to which TC may depend on (1) experienced corruption, (2) perceived corruption and (3) personal perceptions of the anti‐corruption crackdown. The paper explores the differences among the 27‐EU countries and also takes into account the temporal evolution of TC by analysing whether there are differences before and after the COVID‐19 pandemic. This paper provides strong evidence that the greater the exposure to corruption, the greater the TC in all the time scenarios considered, which could eventually lead to a very dangerous vicious circle effect. However, no evidence is found in favour of above relations 2 and 3, nor of significant differences between before and after the pandemic. These findings highlight the importance for policymakers and other authorities to devise corrective measures to prevent citizens from being exposed to corruption by promoting a culture of zero TC.

Suggested Citation

  • Begoña Alvarez‐García & Dolores Lagoa‐Varela & Susana Iglesias‐Antelo & Jorge Gallud Cano, 2026. "Exploring Tolerance Towards Corruption in the European Union Through Experienced Corruption, Perceived Corruption and Institutional Trust," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 1279-1304, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1279-1304
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12834
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quan Le & Meenakshi Rishi, 2006. "Corruption and Capital Flight: An Empirical Assessment," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 523-540.
    2. Gründler, Klaus & Potrafke, Niklas, 2019. "Corruption and economic growth: New empirical evidence," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Naci Mocan, 2008. "What Determines Corruption? International Evidence From Microdata," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 46(4), pages 493-510, October.
    4. Ting Gong & Shiru Wang, 2013. "Indicators and Implications of Zero Tolerance of Corruption: The Case of Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 569-586, July.
    5. Eleftherios Spyromitros & Minas Panagiotidis, 2022. "The impact of corruption on economic growth in developing countries and a comparative analysis of corruption measurement indicators," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2129368-212, December.
    6. Jerry Hausman, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    7. Judge, William Q. & McNatt, D. Brian & Xu, Weichu, 2011. "The antecedents and effects of national corruption: A meta-analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 93-103, January.
    8. Cameron, Lisa & Chaudhuri, Ananish & Erkal, Nisvan & Gangadharan, Lata, 2009. "Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: Experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(7-8), pages 843-851, August.
    9. Adrian V. Horodnic & Sorin Mazilu & Liviu Oprea, 2018. "Drivers behind widespread informal payments in the Romanian public health care system: From tolerance to corruption to socio‐economic and spatial patterns," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 597-611, April.
    10. Jan Hunady, 2017. "Individual and institutional determinants of corruption in the EU countries: the problem of its tolerance," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 34(1), pages 139-157, April.
    11. Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel, 2021. "What We (Don't) Know so Far About Tolerance Towards Corruption in European Democracies: Measurement Approaches, Determinants, and Types," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 1131-1153, October.
    12. Gutmann, Jerg & Padovano, Fabio & Voigt, Stefan, 2020. "Perception vs. experience: Explaining differences in corruption measures using microdata," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. In-Woo Jun & Kyoung-In Kim & Chris Rowley, 2019. "Organizational culture and the tolerance of corruption: the case of South Korea," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 534-553, August.
    14. Namporn Thanetsunthorn, 2022. "Corruption and social trust: The role of corporate social responsibility," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 49-79, January.
    15. Adrián Megías & Luís Sousa & Fernando Jiménez-Sánchez, 2023. "Deontological and Consequentialist Ethics and Attitudes Towards Corruption: A Survey Data Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 507-541, November.
    16. Xiajuan Guo & Wenyan Tu, 2017. "Corruption tolerance and its influencing factors—the case of China’s civil servants," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 307-328, July.
    17. Paolo Mauro, 1995. "Corruption and Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(3), pages 681-712.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jhorland Ayala-García & Jaime Bonet-Mor�n & Gerson Javier P�rez-Valbuena & Eduardo Jos� Heilbron-Fern�ndez & J�ssica Dayana Suret-Leguizam�n, 2022. "La corrupción en Colombia: un análisis integral," Documentos de Trabajo Sobre Economía Regional y Urbana 20080, Banco de la República, Economía Regional.
    2. Dejen Ketema Mamo & Enat Agachew Ayele & Shewafera Wondimagegnhu Teklu, 2024. "Modelling and Analysis of the Impact of Corruption on Economic Growth and Unemployment," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Karakostas, Alexandros & Grimm, Veronika & Drichoutis, Andreas, 2025. "Jumping the queue: An experimental study on cultural differences in bribing attitudes among Greeks and Germans," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Liu, Qijun, 2025. "Local connectivity and corruption: Micro evidence from China," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    5. Andreas C. Drichoutis & Veronika Grimm & Alexandros Karakostas, 2020. "Bribing to Queue-Jump: An experiment on cultural differences in bribing attitudes among Greeks and Germans," Working Papers 2020-2, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    6. Richard Kasa & Gábor Réthi & György Hauber & Krisztina Szegedi, 2023. "Simulation of Corruption Decisions—An Agent-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    7. José García-Montalvo & Juan-José Ganuza & Roberto Burguet, 2016. "The Microeconomics of Corruption. A Review of Thirty Years of Research," Working Papers 908, Barcelona School of Economics.
    8. Pittaluga, Giovanni B. & Seghezza, Elena & Morelli, Pierluigi, 2024. "Media fabrication of corruption and the quality of the political class: The case of Italy," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Rotondi, Valentina & Stanca, Luca, 2015. "The effect of particularism on corruption: Theory and empirical evidence," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 219-235.
    10. Camelia Negri, 2023. "Causes and Determinants of Perceived Corruption in the EU countries: a Panel Data Approach," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 75-86.
    11. Massimo Finocchiaro Castro, 2021. "To Bribe or Not to Bribe? An Experimental Analysis of Corruption," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 7(3), pages 487-508, November.
    12. Cotte, Alexander & Ronderos, Nicolas & Martinez, Jorge, 2020. "Corruption and instutitions: An analysis for the Colombian case," MPRA Paper 126316, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Mar 2021.
    13. Asiye Tutuncu & Yasar Bayraktar, 2024. "The effect of democracy and corruption paradox on economic growth: MINT countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1-25, August.
    14. Lambsdorff Johann Graf & Schulze Günther G., 2015. "Guest Editorial: Special Issue on Corruption at the Grassroots-level: What Can We Know About Corruption?," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 235(2), pages 100-114, April.
    15. João Martins & Linda Veiga & Bruno Fernandes, 2023. "Are electronic government innovations helpful to deter corruption? Evidence from across the world," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 1177-1203, November.
    16. Aluko, Bukola & Garri, Myropi & Owalla, Beldina & Kim, Jae-Yeon & Pickernell, David, 2024. "Informal institutions’ influence on FDI flows: A configurational fsQCA analysis of corruption as part of the MNEs’ FDI motivation system," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6).
    17. Massimo Finocchiaro Castro, 0. "To Bribe or Not to Bribe? An Experimental Analysis of Corruption," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    18. Joseph Pozsgai-Alvarez, 2025. "Three-Dimensional Corruption Metrics: A Proposal for Integrating Frequency, Cost, and Significance," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 39-62, May.
    19. Olken, Benjamin A., 2009. "Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(7-8), pages 950-964, August.
    20. Hunt, Jennifer, 2004. "Trust and Bribery: The Role of the Quid Pro Quo and the Link With Crime," CEPR Discussion Papers 4567, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1279-1304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.