Author
Listed:
- Yubing Yu
- Xiuru Zhang
- Reham Eltantawy
- Yulong David Liu
- Justin Zuopeng Zhang
Abstract
In recent years, sustainability has become increasingly important for both scholars and practitioners of supply chain management (SCM), driven by tighter regulations and strengthening consumer and community pressures. To meet these demands, firms must integrate both environmental and social dimensions into their supply chain strategies and practices. This study focuses on the supply chain social responsibility (SCSR) principle of sustainability, which reflects management orientations toward a commitment to norms underlying the future relationships, information sharing, and product development involvement of suppliers and customers. Specifically, we investigate the linkages among SCSR, management practices, and the resulting supply chain outcomes using a balanced centricity (BC) approach. Our analysis extends quality management (QM) into the supply chain by focusing on two sets of practices—supplier QM (SQM) and customer QM (CQM). For this purpose, data are collected from 209 manufacturing firms and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings confirm the positive relationship between SCSR and QM, emphasizing the significance of responsible behaviors toward both suppliers and customers in shaping the overall QM practices within the firm. Second, we show that effective SQM and CQM practices can contribute to improved overall supply chain performance (SCP). Finally, this study reveals that SQM is a crucial intermediary in linking SCSR with SCP, whereas CQM does not exhibit a similar effect. Our findings contribute to the literature on BC and QM practices in supply chains and have practical implications for firms seeking to improve their sustainability and SCP.
Suggested Citation
Yubing Yu & Xiuru Zhang & Reham Eltantawy & Yulong David Liu & Justin Zuopeng Zhang, 2026.
"Integrating Social Responsibility and Performance Through Quality Management in Supply Chains: A Balanced Centricity Approach,"
Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 1118-1133, April.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1118-1133
DOI: 10.1111/beer.12830
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1118-1133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.