IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i2p1099-1117.html

Revisiting Research on Gender Equality and Sustainability Multi‐Stakeholder Initiatives: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Tanja Verena Matheis
  • Christian Herzig

Abstract

Concerns about the slow progress in gender equality, both globally and within corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, prompt a critical assessment of “gendered CSR,” that is, women's empowerment programs and partnerships driven by the private sector. Sustainability multi‐stakeholder initiatives (MSIs), such as Fairtrade International and the Rainforest Alliance, are prevalent channels and initiators of trainings, leadership seminars or “women‐produced” marketing programs. While MSIs aim to improve working conditions, occupational safety, and labor rights—especially for women—the scope and impact of these interventions remain insufficiently assessed. To map the growing evidence for more concerted action in favor of SDG 5, gender equality, we bring the diverse literature on sustainability MSIs into a conversation with feminist perspectives by means of a systematic scoping review. Informed by feminist organization studies, we analyze problem definitions, organizational challenges, and solution pathways, focusing on the experiences of women workers and producers in the Global South. Our findings reveal a broad range of gender‐related efforts, often based on the assumption that empowering individuals leads to the claiming of rights. While some studies highlight structural inequalities perpetuated in the global economy, others point to women's alternative organizing and resistance in the context of sustainability MSIs. We contribute to the academic debate by broadening the notion of gendered CSR and identifying a middle ground between women‐centered approaches and systemic critiques. Practically, the review helps clarify how gender issues are framed and addressed at different levels of intervention while also acknowledging tensions between empowerment initiatives and the persistent inequalities embedded in the global economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanja Verena Matheis & Christian Herzig, 2026. "Revisiting Research on Gender Equality and Sustainability Multi‐Stakeholder Initiatives: A Scoping Review," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 1099-1117, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1099-1117
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12828
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1099-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.