IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i2p1072-1098.html

The Impact of Non‐Market Strategic Integration on Green Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Shareholding Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Rong Ran
  • Xiaoran Yang
  • Yejing Chen
  • Jie Zhang
  • Yijia Xia

Abstract

The effects of non‐market strategic integration are a common concern in both theory and practice. We integrate two non‐market strategies, namely corporate philanthropy in corporate social responsibility and political connection in corporate political activities, and meticulously explore in depth the impact of non‐market strategic integration on green innovation using data from Chinese listed firms from 2011 to 2020 based on the principal‐agent theory. We find that two types of non‐market strategic integration, corporate philanthropy in corporate social responsibility and political connections in corporate political activities, negatively affect corporate green innovation because of the emergence of managerial agency problems. Further investigation into the moderating effect of shareholding structures indicates that both cross‐shareholding and multiple large shareholders can alleviate the negative impact of non‐market strategic integration on corporate green innovation. These findings complement the research on the relationship between non‐market strategic integration and value creation by the firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Rong Ran & Xiaoran Yang & Yejing Chen & Jie Zhang & Yijia Xia, 2026. "The Impact of Non‐Market Strategic Integration on Green Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Shareholding Structure," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 1072-1098, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1072-1098
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12833
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asghar Zardkoohi & Joseph S. Harrison & Mathew A. Josefy, 2017. "Conflict and Confluence: The Multidimensionality of Opportunism in Principal–Agent Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 405-417, December.
    2. Andrea Cardoni & Evgeniia Kiseleva & Paolo Taticchi, 2020. "In Search of Sustainable Value: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Jun Chen & Wang Dong & Jamie Tong & Feida Zhang, 2018. "Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 135-157, June.
    4. Fan, Joseph P.H. & Wong, T.J. & Zhang, Tianyu, 2007. "Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 330-357, May.
    5. Sihai Li & Xianzhong Song & Huiying Wu, 2015. "Political Connection, Ownership Structure, and Corporate Philanthropy in China: A Strategic-Political Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 399-411, June.
    6. Pombo, Carlos & Taborda, Rodrigo, 2017. "Stock liquidity and second blockholder as drivers of corporate value: Evidence from Latin America," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 214-234.
    7. He, Jie (Jack) & Huang, Jiekun & Zhao, Shan, 2019. "Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 400-418.
    8. Zhang, Rongwu & Fu, Wenqiang, 2023. "Multiple large shareholders and corporate environmental performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Zhang, Cheng & Zhou, Bo & Tian, Xuan, 2022. "Political connections and green innovation: The role of a corporate entrepreneurship strategy in state-owned enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 375-384.
    10. Xie, Xuemei & Huo, Jiage & Zou, Hailiang, 2019. "Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 697-706.
    11. Chen, Fengqin & Huyghebaert, Nancy & Lin, Sen & Wang, Lihong, 2019. "Do multiple large shareholders reduce agency problems in state-controlled listed firms? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    12. Hongbin Li & Lingsheng Meng & Junsen Zhang, 2006. "Why Do Entrepreneurs Enter Politics? Evidence from China," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 44(3), pages 559-578, July.
    13. Du, Jialin & Bai, Tao & Chen, Stephen, 2019. "Integrating corporate social and corporate political strategies: Performance implications and institutional contingencies in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 299-316.
    14. Nicolas Poussing, 2019. "Does corporate social responsibility encourage sustainable innovation adoption? Empirical evidence from Luxembourg," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 681-689, May.
    15. Frank Hond & Kathleen A. Rehbein & Frank G. A. Bakker & Hilde Kooijmans-van Lankveld, 2014. "Playing on Two Chessboards: Reputation Effects between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Political Activity (CPA)," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 790-813, July.
    16. Wu, Bao & Jin, Chenfei & Monfort, Abel & Hua, Danni, 2021. "Generous charity to preserve green image? Exploring linkage between strategic donations and environmental misconduct," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 839-850.
    17. Lin, Karen Jingrong & Tan, Jinsong & Zhao, Liming & Karim, Khondkar, 2015. "In the name of charity: Political connections and strategic corporate social responsibility in a transition economy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 327-346.
    18. Xingqiang Du, 2015. "Is Corporate Philanthropy Used as Environmental Misconduct Dressing? Evidence from Chinese Family-Owned Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 341-361, June.
    19. Adomako, Samuel & Abdelgawad, Sondos G. & Ahsan, Mujtaba & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Azaaviele Liedong, Tahiru, 2023. "Nonmarket strategy in emerging markets: The link between SMEs’ corporate political activity, corporate social responsibility, and firm competitiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Mahdi Salehi & Hussein Alkhyyoon, 2021. "The relationship between managerial entrenchment, social responsibility, and firm’s risk-taking and shareholders’ activity," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(5), pages 1035-1049, October.
    21. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & Sinziana Dorobantu & Aseem Kaul & Bennet Zelner, 2017. "Nonmarket strategy research through the lens of new institutional economics: An integrative review and future directions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 114-140, January.
    22. Xu, Yong & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Jian & Xie, Peijun, 2023. "Clarifying the dispute of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from green technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    23. Alex Edmans & Gustavo Manso, 2011. "Governance Through Trading and Intervention: A Theory of Multiple Blockholders," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(7), pages 2395-2428.
    24. Tehmina Khan, 2006. "Company Dividends and Ownership Structure: Evidence from UK Panel Data," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(510), pages 172-189, March.
    25. Xuejiao Zhang & Qingyang Zhao & Wanfu Li & Yu Wang, 2023. "Top management teams' foreign experience, environmental regulation, and firms' green innovation," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 819-835, April.
    26. Jiang, Fuxiu & Cai, Wenjing & Wang, Xue & Zhu, Bing, 2018. "Multiple large shareholders and corporate investment: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 66-83.
    27. Zhi Su & Bo Yi & Linan Wang, 2022. "Is corporate philanthropy a pretext for executives' excess perk consumption? Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 4010-4027, December.
    28. Han Xiao & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Qing Yang, 2023. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation on green innovation: mediation of green dynamic capabilities," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    29. Raghuveer Negi & Amit Kumar Gupta & Vidhu Gaur, 2023. "Effect of green marketing orientation dimensions on green innovation and organizational performance: A mediation‐moderation analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5435-5458, December.
    30. Cumming, Douglas & Rui, Oliver & Wu, Yiping, 2016. "Political instability, access to private debt, and innovation investment in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 68-81.
    31. Xiaowei Rose Luo & Danqing Wang, 2021. "Are Politically Endorsed Firms More Socially Responsible? Selective Engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 535-555, May.
    32. Christopher Marquis & Cuili Qian, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 127-148, February.
    33. Lin Zhang & Yuehua Xu & Honghui Chen, 2022. "Do Returnee Executives Value Corporate Philanthropy? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 411-430, August.
    34. Grzegorz Zimon & Arash Arianpoor & Mahdi Salehi, 2022. "Sustainability Reporting and Corporate Reputation: The Moderating Effect of CEO Opportunistic Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, January.
    35. Cao, Feng & Peng, Songlan (Stella) & Ye, Kangtao, 2019. "Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility reporting," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 287-309.
    36. Xiaohui Wu & Yumin Li & Chong Feng, 2023. "Green innovation peer effects in common institutional ownership networks," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 641-660, March.
    37. David J. Denis & Diane K. Denis & Atulya Sarin, 1999. "Agency theory and the influence of equity ownership structure on corporate diversification strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(11), pages 1071-1076, November.
    38. Caixe, Daniel Ferreira & Kalatzis, Aquiles Elie Guimarães & Castro, Luiz Ricardo Kabbach de, 2019. "Controlling shareholders and investment-risk sensitivity in an emerging economy," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 133-153.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jyun‐Ying Fu, 2023. "Customer concentration and corporate charitable donations: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 545-561, January.
    2. Du, Jialin & Bai, Tao & Chen, Stephen, 2019. "Integrating corporate social and corporate political strategies: Performance implications and institutional contingencies in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 299-316.
    3. Adomako, Samuel & Abdelgawad, Sondos G. & Ahsan, Mujtaba & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Azaaviele Liedong, Tahiru, 2023. "Nonmarket strategy in emerging markets: The link between SMEs’ corporate political activity, corporate social responsibility, and firm competitiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    4. Yi Xiang & Ming Jia & Zhe Zhang, 2022. "Hiding in the Crowd: Government Dependence on Firms, Management Costs of Political Legitimacy, and Modest Imitation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 629-646, April.
    5. Widaryanti & Wan Amalina Wan Abdullah, 2024. "Discovering thematic change and evolution of political connections research," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Daniel J. Blake & Stanislav Markus & Julio Martinez‐Suarez, 2024. "Populist Syndrome and Nonmarket Strategy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 525-560, March.
    7. Liang, Xiao & Chen, Xiaomeng Charlene, 2024. "Mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial constraints: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 954-974.
    8. Weng, Chen & Chen, Jie, 2025. "Can political connections promote corporate social responsibility? Evidence from targeted poverty alleviation programs," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    9. Zheng, Weiting & Ang, Siah Hwee & Singh, Kulwant, 2022. "The interface of market and nonmarket strategies: Political ties and strategic competitive actions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(4).
    10. Liu, Yijun & Nguyen, Trung & Xu, Rong & Lien, Donald, 2025. "Does corporate philanthropy provide insurance value? Evidence from the securities law revision in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Pablo Andres & Inigo Garcia-Rodriguez & M. Elena Romero-Merino & Marcos Santamaria-Mariscal, 2023. "Political directors and corporate social responsibility: Are political ideology and regional identity relevant?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 339-373, January.
    12. Zhongju Liao & Mengnan Zhang & Jie Chen, 2025. "How Does Government Supervision Affect Firms' Environmental Innovation? The Role of Attention Allocation and Political Connections," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10844-10855, December.
    13. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed & Tahiru Azaaviele Liedong & Tazeeb Rajwani, 2022. "Environmental management, nonmarket strategy, and firm performance in emerging markets: The case of ISO 14001," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 139-163, January.
    14. Chenghao Huang & Jing Tang, 2023. "Will auditors charge more for corporate philanthropy? Evidence from China," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 125-153, January.
    15. Liu, Wei & De Sisto, Marco & Li, Wen Helena, 2021. "How does the turnover of local officials make firms more charitable? A comprehensive analysis of corporate philanthropy in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    16. Pei Sun & Jonathan Doh & Tazeeb Rajwani & Timothy Werner & Xiaowei Rose Luo, 2024. "The Management of Socio‐Political Issues and Environments: Toward a Research Agenda for Corporate Socio‐Political Engagement," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 277-306, March.
    17. Jiacai Xiong & Yixing Tong & Feida Zhang & Caiyue Ouyang & Kam C. Chan, 2024. "Does share pledging affect corporate philanthropy? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1-2), pages 180-208, January.
    18. Xiaowei Rose Luo & Danqing Wang, 2021. "Are Politically Endorsed Firms More Socially Responsible? Selective Engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 535-555, May.
    19. Samridhi Suman & Shveta Singh, 2022. "The Role of Multiple Large Shareholders in Dividend Payouts: Evidence from India," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 25(1), pages 120-151.
    20. Fawad Rauf & Cosmina L. Voinea & Khwaja Naveed & Cosmin Fratostiteanu, 2021. "CSR Disclosure: Effects of Political Ties, Executive Turnover and Shareholder Equity. Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:1072-1098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.