IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i1p479-500.html

Does Board Gender Diversity Make Firms Less Greenwashed?

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Cotugno
  • Greta Benedetta Ferilli
  • Egidio Palmieri

Abstract

This study contributes to the literature on corporate environmental responsibility by investigating the impact of female board directorship on the environmental performance of listed financial and non‐financial firms in Europe from 2013 to 2022. We propose a novel proxy for greenwashing that has not yet been implemented at the firm level in financial studies. We applied panel regression estimation with fixed effects to 1300 firm‐year observations. The misleading baseline results show a negative relationship between female board directorship and environmental performance. Conversely, the second layer of analysis indicates a negative relationship between our greenwashing measure and female board directorship, supporting the positive role of women on boards of directors; spurious environmental performance measures obscure this significant association. A set of robustness checks and alternative specifications (generalized least squares and two‐stage least squares) confirmed the consistency of our empirical results. This study has theoretical and managerial implications by reinforcing the crucial role of women in top management positions as supporters of environmental initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Cotugno & Greta Benedetta Ferilli & Egidio Palmieri, 2026. "Does Board Gender Diversity Make Firms Less Greenwashed?," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 479-500, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:479-500
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12799
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12799?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:479-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.