Unearthing the Literature Review Dilemma: A Comparative of Typologies of Literature Reviews

The proliferation of scientific methods spanning industries has culminated in an upsurge in review types. In business and society research, there has been a marked rise in scholarly studies, predominantly framing the discipline of business ethics. Regardless of a mounting quota of review articles in this field, there is scant direction regarding how to conduct robust and profound literature reviews. To be able to offer an enhanced and fortified portrayal of the wealth of literature in this area of study, the systematization of research is indispensable. Whilst a systematic literature review (SLR) adheres to a rigid and forthright process for research concoction with the intent of evaluating and mitigating bias in results, non‐systematic reviews, on the other hand, leverage a more fluid approach for screening and gathering the papers, and are susceptible to author bias, whether unintentional or purposeful. In light of this, the aim of this study is to render a conscientious perusal of the prevalent forms of literature reviews and to explicate the attendant advantages and boundaries of SLRs for theory development in juxtaposition with other styles of literature reviews. The outlined methodological recommendations in this paper can be used as an umbrella for researchers peering to write literature reviews. For scholars tasked with deploying, orchestrating or construing literature reviews within the discipline of business ethics coupled with other related disciplines, this typology serves as an efficacious point of reference.