IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v35y2026i1p391-414.html

Unearthing the Literature Review Dilemma: A Comparative of Typologies of Literature Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Puja Khatri
  • Vidushi Dabas
  • Asha Thomas
  • Giuseppe Russo
  • Andreas Kallmuenzer

Abstract

The proliferation of scientific methods spanning industries has culminated in an upsurge in review types. In business and society research, there has been a marked rise in scholarly studies, predominantly framing the discipline of business ethics. Regardless of a mounting quota of review articles in this field, there is scant direction regarding how to conduct robust and profound literature reviews. To be able to offer an enhanced and fortified portrayal of the wealth of literature in this area of study, the systematization of research is indispensable. Whilst a systematic literature review (SLR) adheres to a rigid and forthright process for research concoction with the intent of evaluating and mitigating bias in results, non‐systematic reviews, on the other hand, leverage a more fluid approach for screening and gathering the papers, and are susceptible to author bias, whether unintentional or purposeful. In light of this, the aim of this study is to render a conscientious perusal of the prevalent forms of literature reviews and to explicate the attendant advantages and boundaries of SLRs for theory development in juxtaposition with other styles of literature reviews. The outlined methodological recommendations in this paper can be used as an umbrella for researchers peering to write literature reviews. For scholars tasked with deploying, orchestrating or construing literature reviews within the discipline of business ethics coupled with other related disciplines, this typology serves as an efficacious point of reference.

Suggested Citation

  • Puja Khatri & Vidushi Dabas & Asha Thomas & Giuseppe Russo & Andreas Kallmuenzer, 2026. "Unearthing the Literature Review Dilemma: A Comparative of Typologies of Literature Reviews," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 391-414, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:391-414
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12789
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Daniels, Chux & AbdulRafiu, Abbas, 2022. "Transitioning to electrified, automated and shared mobility in an African context: A comparative review of Johannesburg, Kigali, Lagos and Nairobi," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    3. Vallaster, Christine & Kraus, Sascha & Merigó Lindahl, José M. & Nielsen, Annika, 2019. "Ethics and entrepreneurship: A bibliometric study and literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 226-237.
    4. Chen, Lujie & Jia, Fu & Li, Taiyu & Zhang, Tianyu, 2021. "Supply chain leadership and firm performance: A meta-analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    6. Salvatore Ammirato & Roberto Linzalone & Alberto M. Felicetti, 2021. "Knowledge management in pandemics. A critical literature review," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 415-426, October.
    7. Paul, Justin & Criado, Alex Rialp, 2020. "The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    8. Varsha P S & Amrita Chakraborty & Arpan Kumar Kar, 2024. "How to Undertake an Impactful Literature Review: Understanding Review Approaches and Guidelines for High-impact Systematic Literature Reviews," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 13(1), pages 18-35, April.
    9. Ricarda Bouncken & Johanna Gast & Sascha Kraus & Marcel Bogers, 2015. "Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02018068, HAL.
    10. Ricarda Bouncken & Johanna Gast & Sascha Kraus & Marcel Bogers, 2015. "Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions," Post-Print hal-02945341, HAL.
    11. Sascha Kraus & Matthias Breier & Weng Marc Lim & Marina Dabić & Satish Kumar & Dominik Kanbach & Debmalya Mukherjee & Vincenzo Corvello & Juan Piñeiro-Chousa & Eric Liguori & Daniel Palacios-Marqués &, 2022. "Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2577-2595, November.
    12. Peter Whitney & William L. Rice & Jeremy Sage & Jennifer M. Thomsen & Iree Wheeler & Wayne Freimund & Elena Bigart, 2023. "Developments in big data for park management: a review of mobile phone location data for visitor use management," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 758-776, August.
    13. Thorsten Schoormann & Julia Schweihoff & Ilka Jussen & Frederik Möller, 2023. "Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36, December.
    14. Marques, T.M. & Narciso, I. & Ferreira, L.C., 2020. "Empirical research on parental alienation: A descriptive literature review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. João J. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Vanessa Ratten, 2017. "International entrepreneurship research: mapping and cognitive structures," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(4), pages 545-566.
    16. Stefanie Mavrakou & Emelie Chace-Donahue & Robin Oluanaigh & Meghan Conroy, 2022. "The Climate Change–Terrorism Nexus: A Critical Literature Review," Terrorism and Political Violence, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 894-913, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Omar Carrasco-Carvajal & Mauricio Castillo-Vergara & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema, 2023. "Measuring open innovation in SMEs: an overview of current research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 397-442, February.
    2. Mario Tani & Valerio Muto & Gianpaolo Basile & Giulia Nevi, 2026. "A Bibliometric Analysis to Study the Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Business Ethics," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 655-677, April.
    3. Shreya Mishra & Ajoy K. Dey, 2023. "Expectation of the Editors’ from Hybrid Review Studies: Focus on Contribution," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(3), pages 243-252, December.
    4. Weng Marc Lim & Manish Das & Wamika Sharma & Aastha Verma & Rajeev Kumra, 2025. "Gamification for sustainable consumption: A state‐of‐the‐art overview and future agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1510-1549, January.
    5. Philipp C. Sauer & Stefan Seuring, 2023. "How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1899-1933, July.
    6. David Moroz & Amandine Laré & Navaneetham Subramaniam & Cuthbert Madzivanyika, 2026. "Mapping the research landscape on SDG 6: A bibliometric analysis," Post-Print hal-05565866, HAL.
    7. Niklas Dahlen, 2025. "Earnouts in mergers and acquisitions: a systematic literature review of a contingent payment mechanism," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 2107-2146, September.
    8. Alida Volkmer, Sara & Meißner, Martin, 2024. "Beyond livestreaming: The rise of social media gifting and paid memberships − A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    9. Marcos Ferasso & Tatiana Beliaeva & Sascha Kraus & Thomas Clauss & Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano, 2020. "Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3006-3024, December.
    10. Ishani Patharia Chopra & Charles Jebarajakirthy & Tanu Jain & Haroon Iqbal Maseeh, 2024. "Electronic shopping cart abandonment: What do we know and where should we be heading?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-30, December.
    11. Singh, Anjali & Lim, Weng Marc & Jha, Sumi & Kumar, Satish & Ciasullo, Maria Vincenza, 2023. "The state of the art of strategic leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Kumar, Satish & Chavan, Meena & Pandey, Nitesh, 2023. "Journal of International Management: A 25-year review using bibliometric analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1).
    13. Kristina Stoiber & Kurt Matzler & Julia Hautz, 2023. "Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1439-1485, May.
    14. Luis Javier Garcia-Martinez & Sascha Kraus & Matthias Breier & Andreas Kallmuenzer, 2023. "Untangling the relationship between small and medium-sized enterprises and growth: a review of extant literature," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 455-479, June.
    15. David Moroz, 2024. "What does terroir mean? A science mapping of a multidimensional concept," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 889-913, September.
    16. Sebastián Uriarte & Cristian Geldes & Jesús Santorcuato, 2025. "Evolution of Ethics and Entrepreneurship: Hybrid Literature Review and Theoretical Propositions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 321-343, May.
    17. Alberto Michele Felicetti & Vincenzo Corvello & Salvatore Ammirato, 2024. "Digital innovation in entrepreneurial firms: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 315-362, February.
    18. Alberto Bertello & Paola Bernardi & Francesca Ricciardi, 2024. "Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 633-683, February.
    19. Corbo, Leonardo & Kraus, Sascha & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano M., 2023. "Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    20. Nitin Garg & G. P. Sahu, 2025. "Decrypting peer-to-peer lending: an integrated bibliometric and content analysis approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(3), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:391-414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.