IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v34y2025i4p2408-2422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How and When Does Unethical Pro‐Organizational Behavior Lead to Organizational Deviance? A Moderated Dual‐Path Model

Author

Listed:
  • Taolin Wang
  • Hao Qu
  • Guanglei Zhang
  • Hao Zhou
  • Fengwen Chen
  • Yong Zhang

Abstract

Previous research on the detrimental consequences of employees' unethical pro‐organizational behaviors (UPB) has been based mainly on cognitive dissonance theory. The authors suggest that moral disengagement theory and cognitive dissonance theory can be used to explain the negative effects of UPB. We conducted two studies, including a scenario experiment and a survey, to test the mediating roles of moral identity and moral disengagement and the moderating role of performance pressure in the relationship between UPB and organizational deviance. The results revealed that UPB impacts organizational deviance through moral identity and moral disengagement and that distinct psychological reactions are differentially moderated by performance pressure. Employees who face low levels of performance pressure are more receptive to the effects of moral identity; in contrast, employees who face high levels of performance pressure are more receptive to the effects of moral disengagement. The theoretical and managerial implications of this research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Taolin Wang & Hao Qu & Guanglei Zhang & Hao Zhou & Fengwen Chen & Yong Zhang, 2025. "How and When Does Unethical Pro‐Organizational Behavior Lead to Organizational Deviance? A Moderated Dual‐Path Model," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 2408-2422, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:2408-2422
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12776
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:2408-2422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.