IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v34y2025i4p2293-2308.html

How Much Does the Business Development of Circular Eco‐Efficient Practices Improve by Shaking Stakeholders up?

Author

Listed:
  • Concepción Garces‐Ayerbe
  • Pilar Rivera‐Torres
  • Aurore Darmandieu

Abstract

European firms are currently in a process of transition toward a circular economy, which is expected to guarantee sustainable growth over time. Developing eco‐efficient practices is a necessary step in this transition. This study analyzes the impact of stakeholder engagement in a circular business ecosystem on the development of these circular eco‐efficient practices. Past literature has evidenced the impact of stakeholder environmental pressure on firm strategic decisions and outcomes. We adopt the stakeholder theory from a more recent vision, arguing that “shaking stakeholders up” within a circular ecosystem is a more advanced strategy than the traditional approach of reacting to stakeholder pressure. Using structural equation modeling, we examine the data of 14,726 European firms and their relationships with five primary stakeholder groups. The results offer theoretical and empirical support for the idea that firms can go further in adopting eco‐efficient circular practices by shaking stakeholders up, selecting them, and managing relationships with them.

Suggested Citation

  • Concepción Garces‐Ayerbe & Pilar Rivera‐Torres & Aurore Darmandieu, 2025. "How Much Does the Business Development of Circular Eco‐Efficient Practices Improve by Shaking Stakeholders up?," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 2293-2308, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:2293-2308
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12768
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrique Acebo & José‐Ángel Miguel‐Dávila & Mariano Nieto, 2021. "External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2671-2687, July.
    2. Wu, Tienhua & Jim Wu, Yen-Chun & Chen, Yenming J. & Goh, Mark, 2014. "Aligning supply chain strategy with corporate environmental strategy: A contingency approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 220-229.
    3. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    4. Kristel Buysse & Alain Verbeke, 2003. "Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 453-470, May.
    5. Bodas-Freitas, Isabel-Maria & Corrocher, Nicoletta, 2019. "The use of external support and the benefits of the adoption of resource efficiency practices: An empirical analysis of european SMEs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 75-82.
    6. Korhonen, Jouni & Honkasalo, Antero & Seppälä, Jyri, 2018. "Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 37-46.
    7. Piero Morseletto, 2020. "Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(4), pages 763-773, August.
    8. Helen Borland & Adam Lindgreen, 2013. "Sustainability, Epistemology, Ecocentric Business, and Marketing Strategy: Ideology, Reality, and Vision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 173-187, September.
    9. Toke Reichstein & Ammon Salter, 2006. "Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 15(4), pages 653-682, August.
    10. Cao, Mei & Zhang, Qingyu, 2010. "Supply chain collaborative advantage: A firm's perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 358-367, November.
    11. Jens Horbach & Christian Rammer, 2020. "Circular economy innovations, growth and employment at the firm level: Empirical evidence from Germany," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 615-625, June.
    12. Sea-Jin Chang & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Lorraine Eden, 2010. "From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(2), pages 178-184, February.
    13. Riikka Tapaninaho & Anna Heikkinen, 2022. "Value creation in circular economy business for sustainability: A stakeholder relationship perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2728-2740, September.
    14. Oguz Morali & Cory Searcy, 2013. "A Review of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices in Canada," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 635-658, October.
    15. Nudurupati, Sai Sudhakar & Budhwar, Pawan & Pappu, Raja Phani & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Kondala, Mukesh & Chakraborty, Ayon & Ghosh, Sadhan Kumar, 2022. "Transforming sustainability of Indian small and medium-sized enterprises through circular economy adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 250-269.
    16. Chen, Jiawen & Liu, Linlin, 2020. "Customer participation, and green product innovation in SMEs: The mediating role of opportunity recognition and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 151-162.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Cristina Zaccone & Cristina Santhià & Martina Bosone, 2022. "How Hybrid Organizations Adopt Circular Economy Models to Foster Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Marcos Carchano & Inmaculada Carrasco & Angela González, 2025. "Examining environmental proactivity in the Spanish wine industry: The moderating role of size," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 127-157, January.
    3. Ying, Ying & Wang, Shixiang & Liu, Yang, 2022. "Make bricks without straw: Eco-innovation for resource-constrained firms in emerging markets," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Andreza Rodrigues de Araujo & Rodrigo Marques de Almeida Guerra & David Lorenzi Junior & Jordana Marques Kneipp & Luísa Margarida Cagica Carvalho, 2026. "Circular and Sustainable Business Model Innovation: Formulating an Integrated Concept Through A Systematic Literature Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-30, April.
    5. Massimiliano Borrello & Stefano Pascucci & Luigi Cembalo, 2020. "Three Propositions to Unify Circular Economy Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Yasanur Kayikci & Yigit Kazancoglu & Nazlican Gozacan‐Chase & Cisem Lafci, 2022. "Analyzing the drivers of smart sustainable circular supply chain for sustainable development goals through stakeholder theory," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3335-3353, November.
    7. Wisdom Kanda & Martin Geissdoerfer & Olof Hjelm, 2021. "From circular business models to circular business ecosystems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2814-2829, September.
    8. Nelson Oliveira Stefanelli & Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour & Lara Bartocci Liboni Amui & Jorge Henrique Caldeira de Oliveira & Hengky Latan & Pascal Paillé & Martin Hingley, 2021. "Unleashing proactive low‐carbon strategies through behavioral factors in biodiversity‐intensive sustainable supply chains: Mixed methodology," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2535-2555, July.
    9. Triguero, A. & Córcoles, D., 2025. "Leveraging eco-innovation and market knowledge for a circular economy transition: Insights from Spanish manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Chamari Pamoshika Jayarathna & Duzgun Agdas & Les Dawes, 2023. "Exploring sustainable logistics practices toward a circular economy: A value creation perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 704-720, January.
    11. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    12. Agustí Segarra‐Blasco & Mercedes Teruel & Josep Tomàs‐Porres, 2024. "Circular economy and public policies: A dynamic analysis for European SMEs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3532-3549, May.
    13. Ana de Jesus & Minna Lammi & Teresa Domenech & Fedra Vanhuyse & Sandro Mendonça, 2021. "Eco-Innovation Diversity in a Circular Economy: Towards Circular Innovation Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Buyukyazici, Duygu & Quatraro, Francesco, 2025. "The skill requirements of the circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    15. Julia Köhler & Sönnich Dahl Sönnichsen & Philip Beske‐Jansen, 2022. "Towards a collaboration framework for circular economy: The role of dynamic capabilities and open innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2700-2713, September.
    16. Dong, Yuting & Sun, Ziyuan & Zhou, Yiqiang, 2026. "Not all voices are equal: stakeholder environmental pressures and corporate green innovation strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    17. Garrone, Paola & Grilli, Luca & Mrkajic, Boris, 2017. "The energy-efficient transformation of EU business enterprises: Adapting policies to contextual factors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 49-58.
    18. Jesus Valero‐Gil & Tiberio Daddi & Sabina Scarpellini & Luca Marrucci, 2024. "Determinants and benefits of over‐certification: A signaling theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5984-5999, November.
    19. Hartmann, Julia & Inkpen, Andrew & Ramaswamy, Kannan, 2022. "An FsQCA exploration of multiple paths to ecological innovation adoption in European transportation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    20. Mariachiara Colucci & Daria Demyanova, 2025. "Illuminating the Field of Sustainable Ecosystems: Framing the Evolution and Future Through Bibliometric and Theme Analyses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10474-10494, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:2293-2308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.