IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v48y2026i3p709-721.html

Markets Mitigate Land‐Use Competition From Energy Crops and Increase Farm Revenues

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte
  • Matthew H. Langholtz
  • Chad M. Hellwinckel

Abstract

Meeting the US Sustainable Aviation Fuel Grand Challenge target of 35 billion gal annually by 2050 will require an estimated 380 million–700 million dry tons of agricultural biomass feedstock. This study evaluates the implications of large‐scale biomass production for land use, crop production, and market outcomes under mature market conditions. Results suggest that producing 476 million–843 million dry tons of biomass annually from agriculture would reduce cropland planted in corn, wheat, and soy by 8%–14%. However, convergence toward higher‐quality cropland raises per‐acre yields by 2%–9% relative to a business‐as‐usual baseline, limiting net production losses to 1%–3%. At the same time, farm market incomes increase by 20%–33%, whereas food price impacts remain below 1%. These findings indicate that substantial expansion of agricultural biomass for sustainable aviation fuel can be achieved with relatively modest impacts on food production and prices while also improving farm income.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte & Matthew H. Langholtz & Chad M. Hellwinckel, 2026. "Markets Mitigate Land‐Use Competition From Energy Crops and Increase Farm Revenues," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(3), pages 709-721, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:3:p:709-721
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70051
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.70051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Condon, Nicole & Klemick, Heather & Wolverton, Ann, 2015. "Impacts of ethanol policy on corn prices: A review and meta-analysis of recent evidence," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 63-73.
    2. Muth, D.J. & Bryden, K.M. & Nelson, R.G., 2013. "Sustainable agricultural residue removal for bioenergy: A spatially comprehensive US national assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 403-417.
    3. Tara W. Hudiburg & WeiWei Wang & Madhu Khanna & Stephen P. Long & Puneet Dwivedi & William J. Parton & Melannie Hartman & Evan H. DeLucia, 2016. "Impacts of a 32-billion-gallon bioenergy landscape on land and fossil fuel use in the US," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, January.
    4. Anthony Oliver & Madhu Khanna, 2017. "What Is the Cost of a Renewable Energy–Based Approach to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 93(3), pages 437-458.
    5. Yijia Li & Ruiqing Miao & Madhu Khanna, 2019. "Effects of Ethanol Plant Proximity and Crop Prices on Land-Use Change in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(2), pages 467-491.
    6. Langholtz, Matthew & Graham, Robin & Eaton, Laurence & Perlack, Robert & Hellwinkel, Chad & De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel G., 2012. "Price projections of feedstocks for biofuels and biopower in the U.S," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 484-493.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Ziheng, 2025. "CO2-driven crop comparative advantage and planting decision: Evidence from US cropland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Austin, K.G. & Jones, J.P.H. & Clark, C.M., 2022. "A review of domestic land use change attributable to U.S. biofuel policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Dale, Virginia H. & Kline, Keith L. & Buford, Marilyn A. & Volk, Timothy A. & Tattersall Smith, C. & Stupak, Inge, 2016. "Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1158-1171.
    4. Canabarro, N.I. & Silva-Ortiz, P. & Nogueira, L.A.H. & Cantarella, H. & Maciel-Filho, R. & Souza, G.M., 2023. "Sustainability assessment of ethanol and biodiesel production in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Guatemala," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Huang, Shiyang & Hu, Guiping & Chennault, Carrie & Su, Liu & Brandes, Elke & Heaton, Emily & Schulte, Lisa & Wang, Lizhi & Tyndall, John, 2016. "Agent-based modeling of bioenergy crop adoption and farmer decision-making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1188-1201.
    6. Gao, Yixuan & Malone, Trey & Schaefer, K. Aleks & Myers, Robert J., 2023. "Disentangling Short-Run COVID-19 Price Impact Pathways in the US Corn Market," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
    7. Majeed, Fahd & Khanna, Madhu & Miao, Ruiqing & Betes, Elena Blanc & Hudiburg, Tara & DeLucia, Evan, 2022. "Payment for carbon mitigation reduces riskiness of bioenergy crop production," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322277, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Johanna Choumert & Pascale Combes Motel & Charlain Guegang Djimeli, 2017. "The biofuel-development nexus: A meta-analysis," CERDI Working papers halshs-01512678, HAL.
    9. Toka, Agorasti & Iakovou, Eleftherios & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Tsolakis, Naoum & Grigoriadou, Anastasia-Loukia, 2014. "Managing the diffusion of biomass in the residential energy sector: An illustrative real-world case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 56-69.
    10. Araghi, Mansour Khalili & Barkhordari, Sajjad & Hassannia, Razeih, 2023. "Economic impacts of producing bioethanol in Iran: A CGE approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    11. Choumert Nkolo, Johanna & Combes Motel, Pascale & Guegang Djimeli, Charlain, 2018. "Income-generating Effects of Biofuel Policies: A Meta-analysis of the CGE Literature," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 230-242.
    12. Glauber, Joseph W. & Effland, Anne, 2016. "United States agricultural policy: Its evolution and impact," IFPRI discussion papers 1543, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Nava, Noé J. & Morgan, Stephen N. & Ridley, William, 2024. "The Impact of International Demand for Cereals on U.S. farmland prices: A Model Implied Instrumental Variable Approach," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343532, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Adjei, Eugene & Zhang, Jingfang & Sawadgo, Wendiam & Li, Wenying, 2022. "The Effect of Payment–for–Ecosystem Services on CRP Land Enrollment: A Nonlinear Regime-Switching Approach," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322344, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Monia El Akkari & Nosra Ben Fradj & Benoit Gabrielle & Sylvestre Njakou Djomo, 2023. "Spatially-explicit environmental assessment of bioethanol from miscanthus and switchgrass in France [Évaluation environnementale spatialement explicite du bioéthanol produit à partir de miscanthus et du switchgrass en France]," Post-Print hal-04369771, HAL.
    16. Plevin, Richard J. & Delucchi, Mark A. & O’Hare, Michael, 2017. "Fuel carbon intensity standards may not mitigate climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 93-97.
    17. Deepayan Debnath & Madhu Khanna & Deepak Rajagopal & David Zilberman, 2019. "The Future of Biofuels in an Electrifying Global Transportation Sector: Imperative, Prospects and Challenges," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 563-582, December.
    18. Cervi, Walter Rossi & Lamparelli, Rubens Augusto Camargo & Seabra, Joaquim Eugênio Abel & Junginger, Martin & van der Hilst, Floor, 2020. "Spatial assessment of the techno-economic potential of bioelectricity production from sugarcane straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1313-1324.
    19. Bilgili, Faik & Kocak, Emrah & Kuskaya, Sevda & Bulut, Umit, 2022. "Co-movements and causalities between ethanol production and corn prices in the USA: New evidence from wavelet transform analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Veljković, Vlada B. & Biberdžić, Milan O. & Banković-Ilić, Ivana B. & Djalović, Ivica G. & Tasić, Marija B. & Nježić, Zvonko B. & Stamenković, Olivera S., 2018. "Biodiesel production from corn oil: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 531-548.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:3:p:709-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.