IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v48y2026i2p312-323.html

Disaggregated Substitution Patterns Between Plant‐Based and Animal Meats: Evidence From U.S. Household Purchases

Author

Listed:
  • Yawotse Nouve
  • Yuqing Zheng
  • Shuoli Zhao
  • Harry M. Kaiser
  • Diansheng Dong

Abstract

A shift towards plant‐based diets has appeared as a sustainable solution to the increasing carbon footprint. Despite a significant surge in popularity, the efficacy of plant‐based meat alternatives (PBMAs) in achieving the stated goals of enhancing public health, environmental sustainability, and animal welfare through the displacement of animal‐based meats (ABMs) remains inconclusive. Leveraging detailed, representative household scanner data from 2019 to 2021 for 136,553 households, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of consumer demand for PBMAs relative to ABMs. Unlike prior research that primarily relied on experimental methods or highly aggregated market‐level data, this study investigates the extent to which consumers have shifted their protein choices from traditional ABM options to PBMAs based on 26 detailed product categories, thereby offering new insights into the full spectrum of consumer preferences for PBMAs et ABMs. We find that consumers allocate a marginal proportion of their meat budget to PBMAs and are more responsive to the price of PBMAs compared to ABMs, suggesting that price is still one of the major barriers impeding the protein transition. In addition, our analysis of substitution patterns indicates that, depending on the product category, PBMAs serve as both substitutes (e.g., plan‐based beef patty) and complements (e.g., plant‐based bacon) to their ABM counterparts. Combining results from market trends and demand relationships, the PBMAs have not yet looked promising in displacing ABMs in the short‐term future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yawotse Nouve & Yuqing Zheng & Shuoli Zhao & Harry M. Kaiser & Diansheng Dong, 2026. "Disaggregated Substitution Patterns Between Plant‐Based and Animal Meats: Evidence From U.S. Household Purchases," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 312-323, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:2:p:312-323
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70028
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.70028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCullough, Ellen & Zhen, Chen & Shin, Soye & Lu, Meichen & Arsenault, Joanne, 2022. "The role of food preferences in determining diet quality for Tanzanian consumers," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Tonsor, Glynn T. & Mintert, James R. & Schroeder, Ted C., 2010. "U.S. Meat Demand: Household Dynamics and Media Information Impacts," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(01), pages 1-17.
    3. Yen, Steven T. & Fang, Cheng & Su, Shew-Jiuan, 2004. "Household food demand in urban China: a censored system approach," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 564-585, September.
    4. Arthur Lewbel & Krishna Pendakur, 2009. "Tricks with Hicks: The EASI Demand System," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(3), pages 827-863, June.
    5. Marco Springmann & Michael Clark & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Keith Wiebe & Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Luis Lassaletta & Wim Vries & Sonja J. Vermeulen & Mario Herrero & Kimberly M. Carlson & Malin Jonell & , 2018. "Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7728), pages 519-525, October.
    6. A. Parodi & A. Leip & I. J. M. Boer & P. M. Slegers & F. Ziegler & E. H. M. Temme & M. Herrero & H. Tuomisto & H. Valin & C. E. Middelaar & J. J. A. Loon & H. H. E. Zanten, 2019. "Author Correction: The potential of future foods for sustainable and healthy diets," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(4), pages 342-347, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nouve, Yawotse & Zheng, Yuqing & Zhao, Shuoli & Kaiser, Harry M. & Dong, Diansheng, 2024. "A detailed demand analysis of plant-based meat alternatives vs. animal-based meat in the United States," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343798, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. repec:ags:aaea22:343798 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Paul Fesenfeld, Lukas & Maier, Maiken & Brazzola, Nicoletta & Stolz, Niklas & Sun, Yixian & Kachi, Aya, 2023. "How information, social norms, and experience with novel meat substitutes can create positive political feedback and demand-side policy change," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    4. Chutarat Noosuwan & Christopher Gan & Tullaya Boonsaeng, 2025. "Reaction effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on Thailand’s household expenditure patterns," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 68(6), pages 2587-2654, June.
    5. Budhathoki, Srijan & McCluskey, Jill, 2026. "Demand Substitution Between Meat and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Under Meat Taxes and Price Incentives: Evidence from U.S. Households," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404569, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Jing Cao & Mun Sing Ho & Wenhao Hu & Dale Jorgenson, 2021. "Urban household consumption in China: Price, income, and demographic effects," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 810-833, May.
    7. Ellen B. McCullough, 2025. "Structural transformation without industrialization? Evidence from Tanzanian consumers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(2), pages 411-439, March.
    8. Gilbert, Rachel, 2025. "Revealed preferences towards and away from healthy diets," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361158, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Ken E. Giller & Thomas Delaune & João Vasco Silva & Katrien Descheemaeker & Gerrie Ven & Antonius G.T. Schut & Mark Wijk & James Hammond & Zvi Hochman & Godfrey Taulya & Regis Chikowo & Sudha Narayana, 2021. "The future of farming: Who will produce our food?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(5), pages 1073-1099, October.
    10. Wang, Chengjun & Wang, Rendong & Fei, Ximin & Li, Lei, 2024. "Price effects of residents' consumption carbon emissions: Evidence from rural and urban China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Bouyssou, Clara G. & Jensen, Jørgen Dejgård & Yu, Wusheng, 2024. "Food for thought: A meta-analysis of animal food demand elasticities across world regions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Rhys Manners, 2020. "Evaluating Animal-Based Foods and Plant-Based Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria and SWOT Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Cheng, Leilei & Yin, Changbin & Chien, Hsiaoping, 2015. "Demand for milk quantity and safety in urban China: evidence from Beijing and Harbin," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(2), April.
    14. Vermunt, D.A. & Wojtynia, N. & Hekkert, M.P. & Van Dijk, J. & Verburg, R. & Verweij, P.A. & Wassen, M. & Runhaar, H., 2022. "Five mechanisms blocking the transition towards ‘nature-inclusive’ agriculture: A systemic analysis of Dutch dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    15. Goodwin, Barry K., 2024. "A 'Differential' Differential Demand System: An Application to US Meat Demand," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343712, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.
    17. Albert, Osei-Owusu Kwame & Marianne, Thomsen & Jonathan, Lindahl & Nino, Javakhishvili Larsen & Dario, Caro, 2020. "Tracking the carbon emissions of Denmark's five regions from a producer and consumer perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    18. Caillavet, France & Fadhuile, Adélaïde & Nichèle, Véronique, 2019. "Assessing the distributional effects of carbon taxes on food: Inequalities and nutritional insights in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 20-31.
    19. Li, Yilin & Chen, Bin & Li, Chaohui & Li, Zhi & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "Energy perspective of Sino-US trade imbalance in global supply chains," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. António Almeida & Joana Torres & Isilda Rodrigues, 2023. "The Impact of Meat Consumption on Human Health, the Environment and Animal Welfare: Perceptions and Knowledge of Pre-Service Teachers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    21. Sylvain, Dernat & Bertrand, Dumont & Dominique, Vollet, 2023. "La Grange®: A generic game to reveal trade-offs and synergies among stakeholders in livestock farming areas," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:2:p:312-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.