IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v47y2025i5p1726-1744.html

How Did Food Acquisition Patterns Evolve During the Course of the COVID‐19 Pandemic? An International Study During 2021, 2022, and 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Moonwon Soh
  • Glory Orivri
  • Sungeun Yoon
  • Lijun Angelia Chen
  • Lisa House

Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic compelled governments to implement various stringent measures, causing changes in food consumption patterns. In this study, we examine changes in consumer behaviors such as online grocery shopping and restaurant dine‐in/takeouts in the United States, Canada, France, the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Japan from 2021 to 2023 using multivariate probit regressions. The results reveal that food acquisition behaviors are shaped by a complex interplay of risk perceptions, socio‐demographic characteristics, and changing pandemic phases. Our study offers insights for food business marketing strategies and provides information for stakeholders in the international agribusiness industry through a multi‐country comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Moonwon Soh & Glory Orivri & Sungeun Yoon & Lijun Angelia Chen & Lisa House, 2025. "How Did Food Acquisition Patterns Evolve During the Course of the COVID‐19 Pandemic? An International Study During 2021, 2022, and 2023," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(5), pages 1726-1744, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:5:p:1726-1744
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.70014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kvalsvik, Fifi, 2022. "Understanding the role of situational factors on online grocery shopping among older adults," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Shaw, Norman & Eschenbrenner, Brenda & Baier, Daniel, 2022. "Online shopping continuance after COVID-19: A comparison of Canada, Germany and the United States," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Matthew Keeble & Jean Adams & Gary Sacks & Lana Vanderlee & Christine M. White & David Hammond & Thomas Burgoine, 2020. "Use of Online Food Delivery Services to Order Food Prepared Away-From-Home and Associated Sociodemographic Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional, Multi-Country Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Li Gan & Victoria Vernon, 2003. "Testing the Barten Model of Economies of Scale in Household Consumption: Toward Resolving a Paradox of Deaton and Paxson," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(6), pages 1361-1377, December.
    5. JiHyo Moon & Yunseon Choe & HakJun Song, 2021. "Determinants of Consumers’ Online/Offline Shopping Behaviours during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. El Aissoug, Chaimaa & Kim, Thai-Young & Wang, Xue-Qin & Choi, Dong-Hyun, 2024. "Cross-cultural exploration of determinants of e-commerce adoption: Perspectives from logistics service quality and payment driver," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Simone Braun & Dunia Osman, 2024. "Online grocery shopping adoption versus non-adoption among the over-50s in Germany," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 825-862, June.
    3. Alcedo, Joel & Cavallo, Alberto & Mishra, Prachi & Spilimbergo, Antonio, 2025. "Back to trend: COVID effects on E-commerce in 44 countries," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Sanae Tashiro, 2009. "Differences in Food Preparation by Race and Ethnicity: Evidence from the American Time Use Survey," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 161-180, December.
    5. Ekaterina Berendeeva & Tatiana Ratnikova, 2016. "The Deaton–Paxson paradox in the consumption of Russian households," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 42, pages 54-74.
    6. Jabbour Al Maalouf, Nada & Sayegh, Elie & Makhoul, Wissam & Sarkis, Nada, 2025. "Consumers' attitudes and purchase intentions toward food ordering via online platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Cecilia Castaldo & Matilde Giaccherini & Giacomo Pallante & Alessandro Palma, 2024. "Unveiling Shades of Green Food beyond Labels. Evidence from an Online Experiment to Climate Adaptation," CESifo Working Paper Series 11161, CESifo.
    8. Dey, Bikash Koli & Sarkar, Mitali & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu & Sarkar, Biswajit, 2023. "Do you think that the home delivery is good for retailing?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Trevon D. Logan, 2011. "Economies Of Scale In The Household: Puzzles And Patterns From The American Past," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 49(4), pages 1008-1028, October.
    10. Jayasinghe, Maneka & Chai, Andreas & Ratnasiri, Shyama & Smith, Christine, 2017. "The power of the vegetable patch: How home-grown food helps large rural households achieve economies of scale & escape poverty," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 62-74.
    11. Ut-Tha Veenarat, 2023. "Pioneering Eco-Cart: Carbon Reduction Solutions for Thai Online Shoppers," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(4), pages 515-536, December.
    12. Gutierrez, Federico H., 2018. "A Sharing Model of the Household: Explaining the Deaton-Paxson Paradox and Computing Household Indifference Scales," GLO Discussion Paper Series 166, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    13. Jianxin Guo & Songqing Jin & Jichun Zhao & Yuhua Li, 2023. "E‐commerce and supply chain resilience during COVID‐19: Evidence from agricultural input e‐stores in China," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 369-393, June.
    14. Marcel Fafchamps & Agnes R. Quisumbing & IFPRI, 2006. "Household Formation and Marriage Markets," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-039, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    15. Karbasi, A. & Mohammadzadeh, S.H., 2018. "Estimating Household Expenditure Economies of Scale in Iran," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277152, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Khalek, Sk Abu & Dey, Debasmita & Chakraborty, Anirban & Samanta, Tamal, 2025. "“From expectations to frustrations†: Dissecting negative experiences to understand negative word-of-mouth in online grocery services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Jamal, Shaila & Li, Chunjiang & Tiznado-Aitken, Ignacio & Farber, Steven, 2025. "Exploring equity implications of online grocery, online restaurant delivery and e-shopping service usage in a suburban context," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    18. Alejandrina Salcedo & Todd Schoellman & Michèle Tertilt, 2012. "Families as roommates: Changes in U.S. household size from 1850 to 2000," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 3(1), pages 133-175, March.
    19. Melián-González, Santiago, 2022. "Gig economy delivery services versus professional service companies: Consumers’ perceptions of food-delivery services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Xueting Jin & Daoqin Tong, 2024. "Impacts of COVID-19 on Food Access: An Examination of People’s Food Shopping Methods Change," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 47(4), pages 411-442, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:5:p:1726-1744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.