IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v47y2025i4p1507-1537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farmworker bargaining in US agricultural labor markets

Author

Listed:
  • Ujjwol Paudel
  • Timothy J. Richards

Abstract

“Superstar firms” can be large and successful without necessarily exploiting market power over labor markets (Autor et al., Quarterly Journal of Economics 2020; 135(2):645–709). In this paper, we examine this idea in an agricultural labor market setting by studying the empirical relationship between employment surplus, which is essentially the excess of a worker's value of marginal product over their wage, and wages. We use a model of search, match, and bargaining that explains how the surplus from worker's productivity is split between workers and employers. Our estimates show that workers' mean productivity is $8.67 per hour, and they receive 24.2% of employment surplus, but both exhibit substantial heterogeneity over workers. Heterogeneity in productivity and bargaining power suggests that workers who are able to generate “a bigger pie” may also earn a larger share of it. Consistent with this notion, our analysis shows a robust positive elasticity of surplus with observed wages, implying that agricultural firms gain more (surplus) by paying their workers higher wages and not necessarily through exploitation or “winner‐take‐all” strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ujjwol Paudel & Timothy J. Richards, 2025. "Farmworker bargaining in US agricultural labor markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(4), pages 1507-1537, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:4:p:1507-1537
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13526
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.13526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:4:p:1507-1537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.