IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v47y2025i3p1162-1190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stringency and dissimilarity of Maximum Residue Levels affect bilateral agri‐food trade stability

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Engemann
  • Yaghoob Jafari
  • Thomas Heckelei

Abstract

Food standards are rising in both prevalence and stringency. They protect consumers and may enhance demand stability but also pose compliance challenges to producers, with ambiguous effects on the stability of trade relationships. We analyze the impact of importers' Maximum Residue Levels (MRLs) along with bilateral MRL dissimilarity between trade partners, on trade duration and volatility. We find that stricter MRLs in importing countries enhance trade stability, whereas MRL dissimilarities reduce it. The results suggest that importers with less strict MRLs than their trade partners can improve trade stability by reducing MRL dissimilarities. However, when importers have stricter MRLs, they might face a trade‐off between the benefits of lowering discrepancies for trade stability and the downsides of reduced stringency for food safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Engemann & Yaghoob Jafari & Thomas Heckelei, 2025. "Stringency and dissimilarity of Maximum Residue Levels affect bilateral agri‐food trade stability," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(3), pages 1162-1190, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:3:p:1162-1190
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13509
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.13509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:3:p:1162-1190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.