IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v42y2026i3p929-953.html

An examination of trends in U.S. orange and grapefruit juice consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Hayden Stewart
  • Diansheng Dong
  • Anne T. Byrne

Abstract

The average U.S. consumer has been drinking less orange and less grapefruit juice over time. Per capita consumption is down more than 50% since the mid‐2000s. In this study, we propose and estimate a count data model. The number of times an adult consumes 100% orange or 100% grapefruit juice over a 2‐day period is modeled as a function of income, product prices, and some characteristics of the consumer such as level of education, being on a diet, and taking nutrient supplements that proxy for health concerns and nutrition knowledge. Data used in the study were collected between January 2005 and March 2020 on over 30,000 adult consumers. Tests for overdispersion favor a negative binomial model instead of the more restrictive Poison regression model. Estimation results confirm that rising juice product prices and concern over product healthfulness have been contributing to long run trends in orange and grapefruit juice consumption. Prices for these citrus juices have increased in recent years due in part to the citrus greening disease and hazardous weather in Florida. Trends in orange and grapefruit juice consumption can impact consumer diet quality, fruit growers, and agribusiness firms responsible for transforming raw fruit into juice and juice products. [EconLit Citations: D12, Q13].

Suggested Citation

  • Hayden Stewart & Diansheng Dong & Anne T. Byrne, 2026. "An examination of trends in U.S. orange and grapefruit juice consumption," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 929-953, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:42:y:2026:i:3:p:929-953
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.21961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21961
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.21961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:42:y:2026:i:3:p:929-953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.