IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v42y2026i2p623-640.html

Do All Food and Beverage Firms Benefit From Voluntary ESG Reporting? Evidence From China's Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Hongqiang Yan
  • Ashok K. Mishra
  • Xi Zhou

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between voluntary Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting and firm performance—measured by Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin's Q—in China's food and beverage (F&B) sector. Using a fixed effects panel model on a data set of both reporting and non‐reporting listed firms from 2008 to 2023, we find that, overall, the issuance of standalone ESG reports is negatively associated with firm performance across all three measures. However, the results also reveal that this relationship becomes positive when firms exhibit ESG performance above the industry median. These findings suggest that ESG reporting, in isolation, may represent a costly signal in the short term. Nonetheless, firms that effectively implement ESG initiatives and earn superior scores from third‐party agencies can achieve improved outcomes over time. Implications for the F&B sector are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongqiang Yan & Ashok K. Mishra & Xi Zhou, 2026. "Do All Food and Beverage Firms Benefit From Voluntary ESG Reporting? Evidence From China's Listed Companies," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 623-640, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:623-640
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.70004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.70004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:623-640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.