IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/accper/v9y2010i1p29-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ontario Securities Commission on Accounting and Auditing from the 1960s to 2008 – Part 1: 1960s to 1985

Author

Listed:
  • STEPHEN A. ZEFF
  • VAUGHAN S. RADCLIFFE

Abstract

We present Part 1 of a historical review and analysis of the role played by the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) in accounting and auditing from the 1960s onwards. Part 1 deals with the period from the 1960s to 1985. Parts 2 and 3 will treat the roles played by the first five Chief Accountants, from 1986 to 2008. As the principal Canadian stock exchange in recent times has been the Toronto Stock Exchange, the OSC has been the most important securities market regulator in Canada. Prior to this article, the academic and professional accounting literature has been largely barren on the OSC’s evolving role on accounting and auditing issues. Le rôle de la Commission des valeurs mobilières de l’Ontario en matière de comptabilité et d’audit des années 1960 à 2008 — Partie 1 : Années 1960 à 1985 Résumé Les auteurs présentent la première partie de leur revue historique et de leur analyse du rôle joué par la Commission des valeurs mobilières de l’Ontario (CVMO) en comptabilité et en audit, à compter des années 1960. Cette première partie de leur étude porte sur la période s’échelonnant des années 1960 à 1985. Les deuxième et troisième parties porteront sur les rôles joués par les cinq premiers Chefs comptables, de 1986 à 2008. La Bourse de Toronto ayant été la principale bourse canadienne au cours des dernières années, la CVMO a aussi été première en importance parmi les autorités de réglementation du marché des valeurs mobilières au Canada. Jusqu’à maintenant, les écrits sur la théorie et la profession comptables étaient demeurés à peu près silencieux sur l’évolution du rôle de la CVMO au chapitre de la comptabilité et de l’audit.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen A. Zeff & Vaughan S. Radcliffe, 2010. "The Ontario Securities Commission on Accounting and Auditing from the 1960s to 2008 – Part 1: 1960s to 1985," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 29-53, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:accper:v:9:y:2010:i:1:p:29-53
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3838.2010.00003.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3838.2010.00003.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3838.2010.00003.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Zeff, 2007. "The SEC rules historical cost accounting: 1934 to the 1970s," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(S1), pages 49-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ray Ball, 2009. "Market and Political/Regulatory Perspectives on the Recent Accounting Scandals," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 277-323, May.
    2. Glover Jonathan, 2014. "Have Academic Accountants and Financial Accounting Standard Setters Traded Places?," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 17-26, February.
    3. Richard Macve, 2010. "The Case for Deprival Value," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(1), pages 111-119, March.
    4. Marc NIKITIN, 2013. "Can Aristotle Help Us Specify the Very Nature of Management problem?," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2253, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    5. Gwilliam, David & Jackson, Richard H.G., 2008. "Fair value in financial reporting: Problems and pitfalls in practice," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 240-259.
    6. Macve, R.H., 2015. "Fair value vs conservatism? Aspects of the history of accounting, auditing, business and finance from ancient Mesopotamia to modern China," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 124-141.
    7. Baker C. Richard, 2019. "Commentary on Braun’s “The Ecological Rationality of Historical Costs and Conservatism”," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, March.
    8. Olante, Maria Elena & Lassini, Ugo, 2022. "Investment property: Fair value or cost model? Recent evidence from the application of IAS 40 in Europe," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    9. Erb, Carsten & Pelger, Christoph, 2015. "“Twisting words”? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard-setting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 13-40.
    10. Bougen, Philip D. & Young, Joni J., 2012. "Fair value accounting: Simulacra and simulation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 390-402.
    11. Stephen A. Zeff, 2008. "IFRS Developments in the USA and EU, and Some Implications for Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(4), pages 275-282, December.
    12. Marc Nikitin, 2014. "Can Aristotle Help Us Specify the Very Nature of Management Problem?," Working Papers halshs-01015082, HAL.
    13. Iulia Jianu & Roxana Ruiu & Ionel Jianu & Mihaita Ruiu, 2013. "The Value and the Evaluation Process in Accounting," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 3(6), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Jannis Bischof & Holger Daske, 2016. "Interpreting the European Union’s IFRS Endorsement Criteria: The Case of IFRS 9," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 129-168, May.
    15. Corinne Cortese & Lee Moerman & Millicent Chang, 2022. "Is the extractive industries standard still fit for purpose?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2807-2838, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:accper:v:9:y:2010:i:1:p:29-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3838 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.