IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Draft Federal Budget 2012: Proactive Elements Should Be Strengthened Further


  • Margit Schratzenstaller



The draft federal budget 2012 is the second "consolidation budget" after the nadir of the financial and economic crisis. The general government's Maastricht deficit is to decline from 3.6 percent of GDP in 2011 to 3.2 percent in 2012. According to the federal medium-term financial framework for 2012-2015 it is to be reduced to 2 percent by 2015. The debt ratio is expected to increase further to 74.6 percent in 2012. It is predicted to rise to 75.5 percent by 2013 and decline again gradually in subsequent years. Due to the financial crisis, the general government expenditure ratio, which, in the pre-crisis year 2007, had reached the lowest level since 1997 at 48.5 percent of GDP, increased to 52.9 percent until 2009. In subsequent years it declined again slowly as a consequence of the cyclical recovery and expenditure-based consolidation measures. For 2012 a level of 51.2 percent is expected. The tax ratio rose slightly in 2008 and 2009 to 42.7 percent and 42.6 percent, respectively, and has remained near 42 percent since then. At 0.9 percent Austria's general government budget deficit as defined in the Maastricht treaty was comparable to the EU average in the pre-crisis year 2007. During the years until 2013 it is expected to remain below average. In 2013 the Austrian budget balance will fall below the Maastricht limit of 3 percent of GDP again, while the EU average will continue to exceed this limit also in 2013. Starting from a level near the EU 27 average of about 60 percent, Austria's debt ratio increased far less than the EU average which will rise to 84.9 percent until 2013.

Suggested Citation

  • Margit Schratzenstaller, 2012. "Draft Federal Budget 2012: Proactive Elements Should Be Strengthened Further," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 85(3), pages 175-187, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2012:i:3:p:175-187

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Margarida Fontes, 2007. "Scientific mobility policies: How Portuguese scientists envisage the return home," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(4), pages 284-298, May.
    2. Bruce Fallick & Charles A. Fleischman & James B. Rebitzer, 2006. "Job-Hopping in Silicon Valley: Some Evidence Concerning the Microfoundations of a High-Technology Cluster," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(3), pages 472-481, August.
    3. Robert Hierländer & Peter Huber & Anna Iara & Michael Landesmann & Klaus Nowotny & Mary O'Mahony & Fei Peng & Catherine Robinson & Robert Stehrer, 2010. "Migration, Skills and Productivity," wiiw Research Reports 365, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    4. Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg & Rebecca Henderson, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 108(3), pages 577-598.
    5. Heckman, James J & Honore, Bo E, 1990. "The Empirical Content of the Roy Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 58(5), pages 1121-1149, September.
    6. Ulrich Kaiser & Hans Christian Kongsted & Thomas Rønde, 2008. "Labor Mobility and Patenting Activity," CAM Working Papers 2008-07, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics.
    7. Lynne G. Zucker & Michael R. Darby & Maximo Torero, 2002. "Labor Mobility from Academe to Commerce," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(3), pages 629-660, July.
    8. Andries de Grip & Didier Fouarge & Jan Sauermann, 2010. "What affects international migration of European science and engineering graduates?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 407-421.
    9. Richard B. Freeman, 2009. "What Does Global Expansion of Higher Education Mean for the US?," NBER Working Papers 14962, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2012:i:3:p:175-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ilse Schulz). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.