IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Self-financing Capacity and Capitalisation of Austrian Manufacturing in an International Comparison

Listed author(s):
  • Michael Peneder


  • Michael Pfaffermayr

For 1998, WIFO estimates a cash-flow to sales ratio of 8.9 percent, approximately the same level as in 1997. Surveys performed by the Confederation of Austrian Industry (Vereinigung der Österreichischen Industrie) among manufacturing firms confirm this estimate and likewise suggest no further improvement of profits. During the first half of 1998, Austrian manufacturing performed well and achieved an above-average export performance, whereas in the second half of the year, especially in the last quarter, demand growth was dampened. The main reason for this reduction in industry growth lies in reduced world demand and, consequently, declining growth in export demand as a result of the crisis in East Asia, Latin America and Russia and the associated turbulent reactions of the financial markets. According to the WIFO business survey, firms revised their expectations of future prices and production downwards in the second half of 1998. The volume of incoming orders and the business climate in general have also been assessed more pessimistically. The same holds true for most of the European countries. On the cost side, the enhanced competitiveness is an important factor of profitability which prevented earnings from falling as a reaction to declining demand growth. In relation to Austria's trading partners, unit labour costs decreased further in 1998 and prices of raw materials fell significantly. The gain in competitiveness is mainly driven by above-average productivity increases rather than reduced producer prices. This has to be seen as a consequence of the ongoing structural change in Austrian manufacturing and it suggests that firms are more and more able to improve the quality and sophistication of their products. With international comparative data only available until 1996, Austrian manufacturing maintained its past position near the European average despite a certain weakening of its cash-flow ratio. The situation is similar with regard to the equity ratio, where Austrian manufacturing – lagging far behind until the end of the 1980s – continues to catch up relative to the European average. However, as Austria is approaching the European level, the process is slowing down. European front runners in terms of cash-flow ratio are the Netherlands with more than 16 percent (1996) and Sweden with 14 percent (1995). Belgium and Denmark also report a somewhat higher ratio than Austria. However, Austrian manufacturing still outperforms Italy and Spain as well as Germany and France, where the cash-flow ratios are below 8 percent. In a global comparison within the "triad", the cash-flow ratio in 1996 was highest in the USA (12 percent), followed by an average of seven comparable European countries (9 percent), and Japan (8 percent) ranking last.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Abstract
Download Restriction: Payment required

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by WIFO in its journal WIFO-Monatsberichte.

Volume (Year): 72 (1999)
Issue (Month): 3 (March)
Pages: 177-186

in new window

Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:1999:i:3:p:177-186
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Arsenal Object 20, A-1030 Wien

Phone: (+43 1) 798 26 01-0
Fax: (+43 1) 798 93 86
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Postal: Austrian Institute of Economic Research Publikationsverkauf und Abonnentenbetreuung Arsenal, Objekt 20 A-1030 Vienna/Austria

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:1999:i:3:p:177-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ilse Schulz)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.