IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wea/econth/v9y2020i2p24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economics' Wisdom Deficit and How to Reduce It

Author

Listed:
  • John F. Tomer

    (Manhattan College, NY)

Abstract

As is well understood, the values inherent in the dominant neoclassical economic paradigm are self- interest and optimisation. These are the values that guide individuals and policymakers in advanced capitalist economies in their economic decision making. As a consequence, the economics discipline, arguably, is insufficiently oriented to helping people and organisations make wise choices, choices about what is really and truly in people's best interests. In other words, there is strong reason to believe that economics has a wisdom deficit. This paper draws on great philosophers such as Aristotle to explain what wisdom is and why, although economics is concerned with the normative aspect of decision making, economics has too infrequently been used to help people or their societies make wise decisions. This paper is also concerned with how a society's economic decision-making processes can be improved in order that these processes incorporate a much greater dose of wisdom. One relevant question here is: can we learn with the help of philosophers, psychologists and organisation researchers how to make economic decisions that apply the practical wisdom that Aristotle advocated? This paper's overall purpose is first to point the way toward greater decision-making wisdom, and second to propose one method for improving the wisdom of important economic-related decision making. Hopefully, this paper will serve to put the issue of decision-making wisdom higher on the agenda of economists and, as a consequence, lead to wiser decisions in the economic sphere, thereby reducing the wisdom deficit.

Suggested Citation

  • John F. Tomer, 2020. "Economics' Wisdom Deficit and How to Reduce It," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 24-37, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wea:econth:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/papers/economics-wisdom-deficit-and-how-to-reduce-it/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/2020/12/WEA-ET-9.2-Tomer.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomer, John, 2008. "Beyond the rationality of economic man, toward the true rationality of human man," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1703-1712, October.
    2. John F. Tomer, 2017. "Smart persons and human development: the missing ingredient in behavioral economics," Chapters, in: Morris Altman (ed.), Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making, chapter 8, pages 137-154, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Andrew M. Yuengert, 2012. "Practical Wisdom and Economic Models of Choice," Perspectives from Social Economics, in: Approximating Prudence, chapter 0, pages 1-10, Palgrave Macmillan.
    4. Morris Altman (ed.), 2017. "Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15532.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sascha Füllbrunn & Tibor Neugebauer & Andreas Nicklisch, 2020. "Underpricing of initial public offerings in experimental asset markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 1002-1029, December.
    2. Jackson, William A., 2013. "The Desocialising of Economic Theory," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 40(9), pages 809-825.
    3. John Davis & Theodore Koutsobinas, 2021. "Attribute substitution, counterfactual thinking, and heterodox economics," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 5(S3), pages 45-54, October.
    4. Alexander D. Binder, 2020. "An Introduction to Catholic Economics: General Welfare, Competing Perspectives, and Human Nature," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 65(2), pages 191-203, October.
    5. Zarri, Luca, 2010. "Behavioral economics has two 'souls': Do they both depart from economic rationality?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 562-567, October.
    6. Marchionatti, Roberto, 2012. "The economists and the primitive societies," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 529-540.
    7. Giuseppe Danese & Luigi Mittone, 2017. "The circulation of worthless objects aids cooperation. An experiment inspired by the Kula," CEEL Working Papers 1703, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    8. Doris M. Merkl-Davies & Niamh M. Brennan, 2011. "A conceptual framework of impression management: new insights from psychology, sociology and critical perspectives," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 415-437, December.
    9. Fabio Zagonari, 2011. "Which Ethics Will Make us Individually and Socially Happier? A Cross-Culture and Cross-Development Analytical Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 77-103, March.
    10. Bélyácz, Iván & Kovács, Kármen, 2021. "Az egyén kognitív korlátaitól viselkedésének előrejelezhetőségéig [From the cognitive boundaries of individuals to the predictability of their behaviour]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 132-149.
    11. Andrew M. Yuengert, 2014. "Sin, and the Economics of ‘Sin’," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 11(2), pages 243-249, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wea:econth:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake McMurchie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/worecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.