Author
Abstract
Capas is a first-class municipality in the Province of Tarlac, Philippines. The town was a part of vast wilderness inhabited by the ethnolinguistic group known as Aetas that occupying the mountain ranges of Central Luzon. The ethnic group continue to practice the traditional cutting and burning of trees to produce “uling” (charcoal) called kaingin which the Philippine laws forbid and termed as illegal farming practices which causes soil erosion, loss of soil fertility, and landslide. Aware of its illegality, they do not have any alternative way of farming. The study will share one of the methods of the Aetas regarding clearing land by burning grass and trees known as kaingin as part of their cultural practices despite the fact that such act violates the environmental laws of the land. Mixed methods research was applied to achieved a comprehensive result. Results showed that kaingin is a part of Aeta culture and it is a source of their social and economic stability and therefore, cultural preservation. Thus, it proposes an alternative upland farming for environmental and economic sustainability. In addition, this research situates indigenous charcoal production within contemporary sustainability discourse, emphasizing governance, cultural rights, and adaptive livelihoods. Ethnographic evidence demonstrates that Aeta resource-use decisions are guided by customary norms, seasonal constraints, and collective stewardship. The findings indicate a persistent policy gap between statutory environmental regulation and indigenous practice, underscoring the need for participatory, context-specific interventions. The study therefore recommends integrative policy frameworks recognizing indigenous ecological knowledge, livelihood security, and co-management approaches as essential components of upland development planning in the Philippines context.
Suggested Citation
Erwin Mercado, 2026.
"The Sustainability of the Charcoal-Making Tradition of the Aeta in the Municipality of Capas, Tarlac, Philippines,"
The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, Vertex International Research and Consultancy, Corp., vol. 1(6), pages 338-348, May.
Handle:
RePEc:vtx:vertex:v:1:y:2026:i:6:id:367
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20457832
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vtx:vertex:v:1:y:2026:i:6:id:367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Director (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://vertexcorp.org/index.php/irmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.