Author
Abstract
Evaluating teaching effectiveness through student feedback has emerged as a critical driver for quality assurance as it is vital in higher education. This descriptive mixed-methods study assessed the teaching effectiveness of major science courses including Analytical Chemistry, Biochemistry, Modern Physics, Electricity and Magnetism, and Fluid Mechanics in the Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSEd) Major in Science program to establish an evidence-based foundation for enhancing overall course delivery. The research systematically evaluated student perceptions of the teaching effectiveness across major subjects by combining quantitative numerical ratings with rich qualitative feedback from students. Findings revealed a "Very High" overall level of teaching effectiveness, yielding a Grand Mean of 4.68. However, thematic analysis of the open-ended responses identified critical areas for immediate pedagogical growth. Four distinct emergent themes were identified: Pedagogical Clarity and Real-World Contextualization, Experiential Learning and Active Engagement, Affective Support and Relational Teaching, and Strategic Pacing and Formative Reinforcement. The feedback explicitly indicated a strong student desire to shift away from passive lectures and AI-susceptible take-home worksheets. Instead, students require interactive in-class problem-solving, authentic hands-on laboratory activities, and the direct application of complex scientific formulas to real-world scenarios. The study concludes that while science instructors maintain highly supportive classrooms, science students require strategic instructional pacing to effectively manage the heavy cognitive load inherent in conceptually dense major subjects. To address these, a comprehensive Course Enhancement Plan was developed. The study recommends that implementing these targeted, hands-on interventions will successfully bridge the gap between abstract scientific theories, concepts and practical classroom application.
Suggested Citation
Enrico Medina, 2026.
"Science Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness in Major Courses: Basis for Enhancing Course Delivery,"
The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, Vertex International Research and Consultancy, Corp., vol. 1(3), March.
Handle:
RePEc:vtx:vertex:v:1:y:2026:i:3:id:147
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19318025
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vtx:vertex:v:1:y:2026:i:3:id:147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Director (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://vertexcorp.org/index.php/irmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.