IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/reoecp/v15y2015i4p349-356n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences with Railway Regulation in Great Britain and the Czech Republic – Round Table Report

Author

Listed:
  • Nash Chris

    () (Institute for Transport Studies (ITS), Lifton Villas, 1-3 Lifton Place, University of Leeds)

  • Tomeš Zdeněk

    ()

  • Jandová Monika

    () (Masaryk University, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Department of Economics, Lipová 41a Brno 602 00)

Abstract

The aim of the Round Table was to compare British and Czech experiences with railway regulation and competition introduction and to determine which lessons can be learnt. Special attention was paid to the question of whether the very complex British reform can be an inspiration for further liberalisation of the railway sector in the Czech Republic or whether there are any reform mistakes that are best avoided. Based on two introductory presentations and subsequent plenary discussion, some consensus emerged. The participants agreed that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to railway regulation and that the introduction of competition should take into account the different circumstances of a particular country. Franchising in passenger operations in Britain successfully stimulated demand but also increased costs to the industry, so its implementation should be completed with care. It seems very unlikely that open-access competition would be a viable solution for the whole passenger rail market because it is limited to a few commercially attractive routes, and as Czech experience suggests, it creates many new problems. Finally, it was confirmed that a strong and dedicated regulator is needed in a newly liberalised environment in order to solve many emerging conflicts and disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nash Chris & Tomeš Zdeněk & Jandová Monika, 2015. "Experiences with Railway Regulation in Great Britain and the Czech Republic – Round Table Report," Review of Economic Perspectives, De Gruyter Open, vol. 15(4), pages 349-356, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:15:y:2015:i:4:p:349-356:n:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/revecp.2015.15.issue-4/revecp-2015-0025/revecp-2015-0025.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:15:y:2015:i:4:p:349-356:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: http://www.degruyteropen.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.