IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Youth Labour Flows and Unemployment in Great Recession: Comparing Spain and the Czech Republic

Listed author(s):
  • Flek Vladislav


  • Mysíková Martina


    (Metropolitan University Prague, Center for European Economic and Social Studies (CEESS), Prokopova 16, 130 00 Prague 3, Czech Republic. Work on this paper has benefited from funding from the European Union´s 7th Framework Programme (Grant Agreement no. 613256, project name: “Strategic Transitions for Youth Labour in Europe”). EU-SILC data were made available to the authors on the basis of contract no. EU-SILC/2012/66 between the European Commission, Eurostat, and Metropolitan University Prague. Our thanks are due to Martin Hála, Seamus McGuinness, Pavel Mertlík, Jirí Vecerník, Pavlína Žáková and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. However, the authors alone remain responsible for the results)

Using Spain and the Czech Republic as examples of two EU countries with different labour market performance, we apply a gross flow analysis based on EU-SILC longitudinal data. We find that while in Spain the increases in youth unemployment are driven mostly by young people who lose their jobs, in the Czech Republic, this is mainly due to new labour market entrants who failed to find a job. The analysis of flow transition rates suggests that youth labour markets with enormously high unemployment rates have not failed in all relevant respects. Their development seems to be hindered predominantly by high risk of job losses and diminishing employment prospects of the unemployed, rather than by impeded transitions from inactivity to employment. In countries with lower youth unemployment rates, unemployment policy agenda appears to be challenged by quite the opposite tendency

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by De Gruyter Open in its journal Review of Economic Perspectives.

Volume (Year): 15 (2015)
Issue (Month): 2 (June)
Pages: 179-195

in new window

Handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:15:y:2015:i:2:p:179-195:n:4
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:reoecp:v:15:y:2015:i:2:p:179-195:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.