Author
Listed:
- Mukucha Paul
(Bindura University of Science Education, Zimbabwe)
- Shumba Victor
(Lupane State University, Zimbabwe)
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the degree to which supplier development initiatives create a favourable environment for promoting sustainable procurement. Sustainable procurement was modelled as a three-factor construct comprising economic, environmental, and social pillars, following the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework. Suppliers were evaluated based on three metrics of sustainable performance. A total of 398 suppliers were evaluated in the Bindura district, which is a key tobacco-farming region in Zimbabwe. A positivist research philosophy was adopted with its attendant quantitative research design. The three constructs comprising the TBL were operationalised using measurement scales distilled from the extant literature to ensure content and construct validity. An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) conducted in SPSS (v26) and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and a Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MG-CFA) run on Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) data analysis software were used to validate the measurement scales. A Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) and related post hoc Analysis of Variance (AVOVA) run on SPSS data analysis software was used for hypothesis testing. The results reveal that supplier development has a statistically significant effect on all three constructs constituting the TBL framework. The study concluded that developed suppliers (contract farmers) performed better than independent farmers in terms of sustainable performance, thereby enabling tobacco merchants to practice sustainable procurement effectively. It is therefore recommended that supplier development initiatives (contract farming) be expanded to enhance sustainable procurement.
Suggested Citation
Mukucha Paul & Shumba Victor, 2025.
"Enhancing Sustainability through Supplier Development Initiatives in the form of Contract Farming in Zimbabwe,"
Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, Sciendo, vol. 76(2), pages 231-244.
Handle:
RePEc:vrs:pojard:v:75:y:2025:i:1:p:17-32:n:1007
DOI: 10.17306/j.jard.2025.00014r1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:pojard:v:75:y:2025:i:1:p:17-32:n:1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.