IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/joinma/v6y2014i4-1p55-67n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competences Assessment and Evaluation Differences and Errors – a Case of IT Profession

Author

Listed:
  • Fryczyńska Marzena

    (Warsaw School of Economics)

  • Jabłońska-Wołoszyn Maria

    (University of Social Sciences)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to verify the hypothesis assuming that appraisal evaluation in companies is overestimated, especially in the case of male IT professionals. Although a valid and reliable evaluation and assessment method exists, and the Development Center method could be mentioned in this context, competences are not assessed properly enough in business. To achieve this goal, the authors analyzed a competence profile relevant to labour market regarding interns graduated from the Polish-Japanese Institute of Information Technology (P-JIIT). The authors explored the results of competence assessment conducted with the Development Center method, as well as the results of performance evaluation upon the completion of a three-month internship in the leading IT companies. The analysis of differences with respect to gender was made basing on the two sources of information on competences. It is preceded by an introduction outlining the main competence-related issues, the Development Center and the performance evaluation principles and errors, as well as the project for IT graduates carried out in the P-JIIT. The findings of the study show that in terms of the performance women in IT industry are evaluated by employers lower than men. This, however, is not the case when we take into consideration reliable scores of assessment conducted by objective assessors during the processes of Development Center.

Suggested Citation

  • Fryczyńska Marzena & Jabłońska-Wołoszyn Maria, 2014. "Competences Assessment and Evaluation Differences and Errors – a Case of IT Profession," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 6(4-1), pages 55-67, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:6:y:2014:i:4-1:p:55-67:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/joim-2014-0035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2014-0035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/joim-2014-0035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:6:y:2014:i:4-1:p:55-67:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.