IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/econom/v13y2025i2p25-53n1002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Fiscal Policies and the Double-Dividend Hypothesis: A Dynamic CGE-OLG Analysis in Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Zaghdoud Oussama

    (Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The nexus between environmental sustainability and economic growth poses a considerable challenge for developing economies. Environmental fiscal policies offer potential solutions, yet their efficacy remains underexplored in nations such as Tunisia. This study examines the implications of these policies and identifies the conditions for achieving the double-dividend hypothesis in Tunisia. Using a dynamic computable general equilibrium model with overlapping generations (CGE-OLG), calibrated with Tunisian economic data, we investigate how these policies can facilitate the decoupling of economic growth from environmental degradation. Our simulation results demonstrate that reallocating environmental tax revenues to non-environmental public expenditures while allowing the pollution abatement budget to fluctuate with economic activity fails to generate a double dividend for the economy. However, under fiscal neutrality, redistributing these revenues to the pollution abatement sector achieves a double dividend: (i) an environmental dividend, represented by an appreciable improvement in environmental quality indicators by 1.8%, and (ii) an economic dividend, reflected in a notable increase in life-cycle consumption patterns for skilled and unskilled workers of 2.89% and 0.56%, respectively. These results suggest that a revenue-neutral environmental fiscal reform focused on developing the pollution abatement sector could effectively decouple Tunisia’s economic growth from environmental degradation while enhancing sustainable development. The results offer critical guidance for policymakers seeking to implement environmental fiscal reforms in Tunisia and similar developing nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaghdoud Oussama, 2025. "Environmental Fiscal Policies and the Double-Dividend Hypothesis: A Dynamic CGE-OLG Analysis in Tunisia," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 25-53.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:25-53:n:1002
    DOI: 10.2478/eoik-2025-0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2025-0029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/eoik-2025-0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    double dividend; environmental taxes; economic growth; environmental sustainability; computable general equilibrium model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:econom:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:25-53:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.