Author
Listed:
- Lyulyov Oleksii
(Sumy State University, Ukraine; WSB University, Poland)
- Pimonenko Tetyana
(Sumy State University, Ukraine; WSB University, Poland)
Abstract
Research purpose. This study explores the cultural underpinnings of green economic development in the EU and Ukraine by examining how national cultural dimensions shape eco-efficiency trajectories, institutional responsiveness, and technological transformation. By integrating Hofstede’s cultural framework with the Malmquist‒Luenberger productivity index (MLPI), this paper aims to identify cultural configurations that either catalyse or constrain green productivity and map country-specific patterns in green economic performance. Design/Methodology/Approach. The research applies a directional distance function-based MLPI model to a dataset of 27 EU countries and Ukraine from 2005–2023. The model distinguishes between technological progress and efficiency change, integrating multiple inputs (capital, labour, renewable energy) and outputs (GDP and an environmental burden index based on CO₂, PM2.5, water stress, fertiliser use, and forest loss). Cultural characteristics were assessed via six Hofstede dimensions. Hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward’s method) was used to group countries on the basis of their cultural and eco-productivity profiles. Canonical discriminant analysis was used to validate the cluster structure and determine the most influential cultural variables. Findings. Three clusters of countries were identified, each reflecting distinct cultural and green economic development profiles. Cluster 1 included high-income, moderately individualistic countries with a strong performance orientation; Cluster 2 included countries with higher indulgence and uncertainty avoidance but moderate green convergence; and Cluster 3 included Eastern and Southeastern European nations with lower eco-productivity, weaker governance, and high cultural rigidity. Discriminant analysis revealed that indulgence, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance were key differentiators. Green TFP exceeded unity in 42% of the years for Ukraine but declined from 2022–2023 due to war-induced disruptions. The model achieved 100% classification accuracy, confirming the predictive value of cultural dimensions in explaining cross-national differences in green growth. Originality/Value/Practical implications. This study advances the theoretical and empirical understanding of how cultural norms influence the national capacity for sustainable transformation. This finding demonstrates that green policy effectiveness is not merely a function of economic or technical readiness but is deeply shaped by the cultural context. Policy implications include the need for culturally adaptive sustainability strategies, especially in countries with hierarchical institutional cultures and risk-averse populations. The findings also support EU efforts to tailor green financing and cohesion policies to cultural realities. Future research should explore dynamic cultural change and extend the analysis beyond Europe to examine global cultural diversity in sustainability transitions.
Suggested Citation
Lyulyov Oleksii & Pimonenko Tetyana, 2025.
"Mapping Cultural Influence on Green Economic Development,"
Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 81-96.
Handle:
RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:81-96:n:1007
DOI: 10.2478/jec-2025-0007
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
green economic development;
Hofstede dimensions;
ecoefficiency;
cultural mapping;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
- Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
- Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:81-96:n:1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.