IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/cusecp/v1y2021i1p55-78n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Theory-Practice Divide in a Museum Showcase

Author

Listed:
  • Bira Monica

    (Faculty of Communication and Public Relations, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 30A Expozitiei Blvd., 012104 Bucharest, RO)

  • Zbuchea Alexandra

    (Faculty of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 30A Expozitiei Blvd., 012104 Bucharest, RO)

Abstract

We aim to map the divide between practice and research in the field of knowledge production and diffusion related to museum studies. In doing so, we draw on the domain literature regarding the evolution of museums as institutions and its implications for the development of a dedicated field of studies. The current research focuses on the publishing work undertaken by museum professionals and researchers, as an essential component contributing to the advancement of research as well as to the diffusion of good practices. More precisely, we scrutinized European journals from the domain available on the Web of Science (WoS) as well as journals not included in the “main” scientific flows and generally published in various languages, other than English.

Suggested Citation

  • Bira Monica & Zbuchea Alexandra, 2021. "A Theory-Practice Divide in a Museum Showcase," Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 55-78, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:cusecp:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:55-78:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/csep-2021-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/csep-2021-0005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/csep-2021-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omar Kassab, 2019. "Does public outreach impede research performance? Exploring the ‘researcher’s dilemma’ in a sustainability research center," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(5), pages 710-720.
    2. Thomas W. Guenther, 2020. "Challenges for a new decade of academic research: an editorial," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 353-356, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zbuchea Alexandra & Iordan Iulia & Michailov Mihaela, 2024. "Bridging Culture and Communities: A Bibliometric Analysis of Collaboration Practices of Museums, Libraries, and Theaters," Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 32-51.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keith A. Chenier & Elizabeth Englebretson & Jessi A. James-Barry & Amanda N. Rigsby & Alyssa E. Rodolfich & Evelyn P. McQueen & Eric L. Sparks, 2024. "Development of a Community-Driven Waste Reduction Education and Action Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Matilda Obeng Kyere & Kezia Gladys Anane Agyei & Peter Agyekum Boateng, 2023. "Cultivating Inclusive Leadership in Management Education: Bridging the DEI Competency Gap," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(12), pages 1897-1920, December.
    3. Hans Jonker & Florian Vanlee & Walter Ysebaert, 2022. "Societal impact of university research in the written press: media attention in the context of SIUR and the open science agenda among social scientists in Flanders, Belgium," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7289-7306, December.
    4. Smolinsky, Lawrence & Klingenberg, Bernhard & Marx, Brian D., 2022. "Interpretation and inference for altmetric indicators arising from sparse data statistics," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    5. Caitlin Drummond Otten & Baruch Fischhoff, 2022. "Assessing broader impacts of funded research: the US National Science Foundation v. Lamar Smith [What is Societal Impact of Research and How Can it Be Assessed? A Literature Survey]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 313-323.
    6. Marta Entradas & João M. Santos, 2021. "Returns of research funding are maximised in media visibility for excellent institutes," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:cusecp:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:55-78:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.