IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ceuecj/v12y2025i59p186-204n1012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workers’ Earnings Losses Due to the Low-Carbon Transition. Theory and Application in a CGE Model

Author

Listed:
  • Witajewski-Baltvilks Jan

    (The National Centre for Emissions Management, ul. Słowicza 32, 02-170 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Boratyński Jakub

    (The National Centre for Emissions Management, ul. Słowicza 32, 02-170 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Jeszke Robert

    (The National Centre for Emissions Management, ul. Słowicza 32, 02-170 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Pyrka Maciej

    (The National Centre for Emissions Management, ul. Słowicza 32, 02-170 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Designing a just transition that leaves no one behind necessitates an understanding of the potential economic costs of this transition for particularly vulnerable individuals. In this article, we analyse the costs of transitioning from high-carbon to less-carbon-intensive sectors for workers. First, we discuss potential reasons for such costs. Second, we employ a microeconomic model to demonstrate that information on the magnitude of these costs can be derived from the empirically observed sectoral labour supply curves. We then illustrate how the system of supply curves can be integrated into a standard Computable General Equilibrium framework. We calculate the potential earnings losses incurred by workers during the transition and compare them to the size of the Just Transition Fund by the European Commission. Finally, we employ the model to estimate the transition costs for Poland. In 2040, the loss for workers due to climate policy is approximately $1 billion, equivalent to 0.5% of total labour compensation. The state could use a Just Transition Fund or allocate a portion of its carbon tax revenue to compensate for these losses, thus reducing the resistance of the most affected workers to more ambitious climate policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Witajewski-Baltvilks Jan & Boratyński Jakub & Jeszke Robert & Pyrka Maciej, 2025. "Workers’ Earnings Losses Due to the Low-Carbon Transition. Theory and Application in a CGE Model," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 12(59), pages 186-204.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:12:y:2025:i:59:p:186-204:n:1012
    DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2025-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2025-0012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ceej-2025-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Card & Jochen Kluve & Andrea Weber, 2018. "What Works? A Meta Analysis of Recent Active Labor Market Program Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 894-931.
    2. Antosiewicz, Marek & Fuentes, J. Rodrigo & Lewandowski, Piotr & Witajewski-Baltvilks, Jan, 2022. "Distributional effects of emission pricing in a carbon-intensive economy: The case of Poland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Devarajan Shantayanan & Go Delfin S & Robinson Sherman & Thierfelder Karen, 2011. "Tax Policy to Reduce Carbon Emissions in a Distorted Economy: Illustrations from a South Africa CGE Model," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Fragkos, Panagiotis & Paroussos, Leonidas, 2018. "Employment creation in EU related to renewables expansion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 935-945.
    5. Perrier, Quentin & Quirion, Philippe, 2018. "How shifting investment towards low-carbon sectors impacts employment: Three determinants under scrutiny," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 464-483.
    6. Orley C. Ashenfelter & Henry Farber & Michael R Ransom, 2010. "Labor Market Monopsony," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(2), pages 203-210, April.
    7. H. Pollitt & E. Alexandri & U. Chewpreecha & G. Klaassen, 2015. "Macroeconomic analysis of the employment impacts of future EU climate policies," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 604-625, September.
    8. Baris Karapinar & Hasan Dudu & Ozge Geyik & Aykut Mert Yakut, 2020. "How to reach an elusive INDC target: macro-economic implications of carbon taxation and emissions trading in Turkey," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1157-1172, July.
    9. Baran, Jan & Szpor, Aleksander & Witajewski-Baltvilks, Jan, 2020. "Low-carbon transition in a coal-producing country: A labour market perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Kiuila, Olga, 2018. "Decarbonisation perspectives for the Polish economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 69-76.
    11. Jean Chateau & Ruben Bibas & Elisa Lanzi, 2018. "Impacts of Green Growth Policies on Labour Markets and Wage Income Distribution: A General Equilibrium Application to Climate and Energy Policies," OECD Environment Working Papers 137, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Witajewski-Baltvilks Jan & Boratyński Jakub, 2021. "Workers or Consumers: Who Pays for Low-Carbon Transition – Theoretical Analysis of Welfare Change in General Equilibrium Setting," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 8(55), pages 231-245, January.
    2. Baran, Jan & Szpor, Aleksander & Witajewski-Baltvilks, Jan, 2020. "Low-carbon transition in a coal-producing country: A labour market perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Adam Dominiak & Artur Rusowicz, 2022. "Change of Fossil-Fuel-Related Carbon Productivity Index of the Main Manufacturing Sectors in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Julien Lefevre, 2018. "Modeling the Socioeconomic Impacts of the Adoption of a Carbon Pricing Instrument – Literature review," CIRED Working Papers hal-03128619, HAL.
    5. Wei, Chuanhui & Zhang, Yongji & Lan, Minghui & Su, Zhi & Du, Heran & Wang, Ke, 2024. "How could we benefit from a low-carbon economy? Evidence from Chinese regional labor markets," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 523-537.
    6. Cormac Lynch & Yeliz Simsek & Jean-Francois Mercure & Panagiotis Fragkos & Julien Lefèvre & Thomas Le Gallic & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Leonidas Paroussos & Dimitris Fragkiadakis & Florian Leblanc & Femk, 2024. "Structural change and socio-economic disparities in a net zero transition," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 607-629, October.
    7. Koasidis, Konstantinos & Nikas, Alexandros & Van de Ven, Dirk-Jan & Xexakis, Georgios & Forouli, Aikaterini & Mittal, Shivika & Gambhir, Ajay & Koutsellis, Themistoklis & Doukas, Haris, 2022. "Towards a green recovery in the EU: Aligning further emissions reductions with short- and long-term energy-sector employment gains," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Alexandri, Eva & Antón, José-Ignacio & Lewney, Richard, 2024. "The impact of climate change mitigation policies on European labour markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Banacloche, Santacruz & Cadarso, Maria Angeles & Monsalve, Fabio & Lechon, Yolanda, 2020. "Assessment of the sustainability of Mexico green investments in the road to Paris," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Guillermo MONTT & Kirsten S. WIEBE & Marek HARSDORFF & Moana SIMAS & Antoine BONNET & Richard WOOD, 2018. "Does climate action destroy jobs? An assessment of the employment implications of the 2‐degree goal," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 157(4), pages 519-556, December.
    11. Jan Frankowski & Joanna Mazurkiewicz & Jakub Sokolowski, 2021. "The coal phase-out and the labour market transition pathways: the case of Poland," IBS Working Papers 01/2021, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    12. Collewet, Marion & Fairley, Kim & Kessels, Roselinde & Knoef, Marike & van Vliet, Olaf, 2024. "The design of welfare: unraveling taxpayers' preferences," OSF Preprints 4am7e, Center for Open Science.
    13. Kim, Jinyoung & Kim, Seonghoon & Koh, Kanghyock, 2022. "Labor market institutions and the incidence of payroll taxation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    14. Matthias Collischon & Kamila Cygan-Rehm & Regina T. Riphahn, 2021. "Employment effects of payroll tax subsidies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1201-1219, October.
    15. Bortnikova, Kseniya & Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana, 2024. "Beauty and Professional Success: A Meta-Analysis," EconStor Preprints 289435, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    16. Stefano DellaVigna & Elizabeth Linos, 2022. "RCTs to Scale: Comprehensive Evidence From Two Nudge Units," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 81-116, January.
    17. Anna Sokolova, 2023. "Marginal Propensity to Consume and Unemployment: a Meta-analysis," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 813-846, December.
    18. Girum Abebe & A Stefano Caria & Marcel Fafchamps & Paolo Falco & Simon Franklin & Simon Quinn, 2021. "Anonymity or Distance? Job Search and Labour Market Exclusion in a Growing African City [Endogenous Stratification in Randomized Experiments]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(3), pages 1279-1310.
    19. Fabrice Gilles & Yannick L'Horty & Ferhat Mihoubi, 2021. "The Effects of the Non-Financial Component of Business Accelerators," TEPP Working Paper 2021-06, TEPP.
    20. Oriana Bandiera & Ahmed Elsayed & Anton Heil & Andrea Smurra, 2022. "Economic Development and the Organisation Of Labour: Evidence from the Jobs of the World Project," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(6), pages 2226-2270.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:12:y:2025:i:59:p:186-204:n:1012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.