IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ceuecj/v12y2025i59p17-33n1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Split Rating Affect Corporate Bond Yields? Evidence from North America and Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Kolegova Irina

    (HTW Berlin -University of Applied Sciences, Treskowallee 8, 10318 Berlin, Germany)

  • Paientko Tetiana

    (HTW Berlin -University of Applied Sciences, Treskowallee 8, 10318 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

The paper aims to determine the effect of split ratings on corporate bond yields. A Two-Sample t-Test was conducted for each risk category of bonds to assess the impact of split ratings. Using a sample of corporate bonds issued between January 2000 and May 2023, the study finds evidence that split-rated bonds exhibit higher yields. This suggests that investors demand greater compensation for the risk associated with split ratings, which stems from the informational opaqueness and uncertainty surrounding these instruments. The research also reveals that the magnitude of the difference between split ratings affects bond yields, with larger gaps leading to higher yields. The findings have significant implications for investors and issuers, emphasising the need to carefully evaluate split-rated bonds and consistent credit ratings. By enhancing our understanding of the relationship between split ratings and bond yields, this research promotes transparency and informed decision-making in the corporate bond market.

Suggested Citation

  • Kolegova Irina & Paientko Tetiana, 2025. "Does Split Rating Affect Corporate Bond Yields? Evidence from North America and Europe," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 12(59), pages 17-33.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:12:y:2025:i:59:p:17-33:n:1001
    DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2025-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2025-0002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ceej-2025-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando Moreira & Sheng Zhao, 2018. "Do credit ratings affect spread and return? A study of structured finance products," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 205-217, April.
    2. Chen, Zhihua & Wang, Zhen, 2021. "Do firms obtain multiple ratings to hedge against downgrade risk?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vink, Dennis & Nawas, Mike & van Breemen, Vivian, 2021. "Security design and credit rating risk in the CLO market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Huang, He & Svec, Jiri & Wu, Eliza, 2021. "The game changer: Regulatory reform and multiple credit ratings," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Yang, Liuyong & Wang, Rui & Chen, Zhenyi & Luo, Xingguo, 2020. "What determines the issue price of lease asset-backed securities in China?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Chenzi Yang & Fernando Moreira & Thomas Welsh Archibald, 2023. "Community banks' capital requirements and regional housing tenure," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(4), pages 723-746, December.
    5. Ahmed A. Elamer & Collins G. Ntim & Hussein A. Abdou & Andrews Owusu & Mohamed Elmagrhi & Awad Elsayed Awad Ibrahim, 2021. "Are bank risk disclosures informative? Evidence from debt markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 1270-1298, January.
    6. Wang, Tong & Zhao, Sheng & Zhou, Mengqiu, 2022. "Does soft information in expert ratings curb information asymmetry? Evidence from crowdfunding and early transaction phases of Initial Coin offerings," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    split rating; bond yields; credit rating adjustments; solicit multiple ratings; credit rating agency (CRA);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:12:y:2025:i:59:p:17-33:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.