IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/voj/journl/v66y2019i4p439-464id425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Was Piketty right? Empirics of CCC Model: Corporate Power, Consumption, Debt and Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Franci Porenta

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical investigation into the empirics of cumulative and circular causation (CCC) model. Relying on their corporate power, corporations have stimulated the rising consumerism, which has increased both private consumption and debt. On the other hand, increasing debt has enhanced the process of rising inequality due to the lack of funding to invest in education or create savings. Rising inequality has further increased the bargaining power of capital and closed the CCC model. This paper tests the proposed theoretical model on a sample of OECD countries in the period between 1990 and 2013. We show that the growing corporate power causes increased consumption, growing household and public debt, as well as higher inequality. The paper makes several original contributions to the existing literature. First, it is the first empirical investigation of the CCC relationship. Second, it extends the knowledge about the trends of rising corporate power and consumerism at macro level. Key words: Corporate power, Consumption, Debt, Non-recursive, Cumulative circular causation, Inequality.JEL: B52, E02, P10.Da li je Piketi bio u pravu? Empirija CCC modela: korporativna moć, potrošnja, dug i nejednakost U radu je pruženo praktično ispitivanje empirije modela kumulativne i kružne uzročnosti (CCC). Oslanjajući se na svoju korporativnu moć, kompanije su podstakle rast konzumerizma, što je povećalo i privatnu potrošnju i dug. S druge strane, sve veći dug je ubrzao proces rasta nejednakosti zbog nedostatka finansijskih sredstava za ulaganje u obrazovanje ili kreiranje štednje. Rastuća nejednakost dodatno je povećala pregovaračku moć kapitala i zatvorila CCC model. U radu je testiran navedeni teorijski model na uzorku zemalja članica OECD-a u periodu između 1990. i 2013. Pokazujemo da rastuća korporativna moć uzrokuje i veću potrošnju, rast privatnog i javnog duga, kao i nejednakosti. Rad pruža nekoliko originalnih doprinosa postojećoj literaturi. Najpre, predstavlja prvo empirijsko istraživanje CCC odnosa. Zatim, proširuje znanje o trendovima rasta korporativne moći i konzumerizma na makro nivou. Ključne reči: Korporativna moć, potrošnja, dug, nerekurzivno, kumulativna kružna uzročnost, nejednakost.

Suggested Citation

  • Franci Porenta, 2019. "Was Piketty right? Empirics of CCC Model: Corporate Power, Consumption, Debt and Inequality," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 66(4), pages 439-464.
  • Handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:66:y:2019:i:4:p:439-464:id:425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/article/view/425/551
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate power; consumption; debt; non-recursive; cumulative circular causation; inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • E02 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Institutions and the Macroeconomy
    • P10 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:66:y:2019:i:4:p:439-464:id:425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivana Horvat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.