IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v97y2021i2p345-371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Decentralized Community Treatment Plants Provide Clean Water? Evidence from Rural Andhra Pradesh, India

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Jeuland
  • Marcella McClatchey
  • Sumeet R. Patil
  • Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
  • Christine M. Poulos
  • Jui-Chen Yang

Abstract

Though there is little evidence on its effectiveness, a decentralized community water system (CWS), such as a market-based kiosk, is thought to be appropriate where piped services are infeasible or unreliable. We assess changes in household behaviors, water quality, and health following the installation of a CWS in rural India, using quasi-experimental methods. Three negative findings stand out: (1) few households use the CWS, (2) water quality is lower among CWS users, and (3) childhood diarrhea is higher among CWS users. This appears to stem from reduced self-protection by users amid continuing reliance on multiple water sources. Decentralized supply solutions will not deliver environmental quality unless household protective behaviors are maintained.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Jeuland & Marcella McClatchey & Sumeet R. Patil & Subhrendu K. Pattanayak & Christine M. Poulos & Jui-Chen Yang, 2021. "Do Decentralized Community Treatment Plants Provide Clean Water? Evidence from Rural Andhra Pradesh, India," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 97(2), pages 345-371.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:97:y:2021:i:2:p:345-371
    Note: DOI: 10.3368/le.97.2.345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/97/2/345
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:97:y:2021:i:2:p:345-371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.