IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Estimating the Public Value of Conflicting Information: The Case of Genetically Modified Foods

Listed author(s):
  • Matthew C. Rousu
  • Wallace E. Huffman
  • Jason F. Shogren
  • Abebayehu Tegene

Environmental groups have be- food products other than those that norcome the chief antagonists toward agricultural bio- mally carry allergens (See Friends of the technology innovations. They demonstrate and dis- Earth 2001; Greenpeace International 2001). seminate private information with the objective of Through press releases, web sites, and pro- changing the behavior of consumers and productests, environmental ers. We use experimental auctions with adult U.S. groups have been succonsumers and show that this information reduces cessful at publicizing their negative views significantly the demand for genetically modified on GM foods and affecting consumers’ and (GM)-food products and that it has significant producer s’ behavior.2 public good value—an average of 3 cents per prod- Environmental groups share the costs uct purchased, or roughly $2 billion annually. We of producing negative GM information.3 also show that the dissemination of independent third-party information about agricultural biotech- Their members benefit collectively from nology dissipatesmost of the public good value of reductions in demand for GM products negative GM-product information.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by University of Wisconsin Press in its journal Land Economics.

Volume (Year): 80 (2004)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 125-135

in new window

Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:80:y:2004:i:1:p:125-135
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:80:y:2004:i:1:p:125-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.