IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v13y2022i5p67-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing strategic planning in municipalities: Methodological, practical and managerial aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan A. Antipin

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Natalya Yu. Vlasova

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

The topicality of municipal strategizing in the Russian Federation is due to, among other things, the lack of a unified methodology for devising and implementing strategies of municipal socio-economic development. The quality of these strategies and their effectiveness vary significantly. The article examines methodological, practical and managerial aspects of the assessment of strategic planning in Russian municipalities. The research methodology is based on the theoretical principles of strategic management, regional and municipal economics. The methods of statistical analysis (ranking and grouping) are used. The empirical basis includes Rosstat statistical data and socio-economic development strategies of the largest Russian cities. In the research, we formulate and test the methodology for a comprehensive assessment of the strategic planning of regions at various hierarchical levels, which allows evaluating the formation process of a strategy, as well as its content and practical feasibility. The results of the assessment have allowed us to distribute the municipalities in question by the effectiveness of their socio-economic development and identify the main drawbacks of the corresponding strategies: lack of analysis of the environment, the mission and the main goal; poorly elaborated strategic avenues; ineffective methods and control mechanisms; untimely adjustments, etc. The socio-economic development of territories is proved to be dependent on the quality of strategic planning and management. The practical value of the study is due to the strong need for timely management of the strategic development of various territories, including municipalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan A. Antipin & Natalya Yu. Vlasova, 2022. "Assessing strategic planning in municipalities: Methodological, practical and managerial aspects," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 67-84, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:5:p:67-84
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-5-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/99/5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2022/1139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-5-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dave Guyadeen, 2018. "Do Practicing Planners Value Plan Quality? Insights From a Survey of Planning Professionals in Ontario, Canada," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(1), pages 21-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiao Hu & Zhenghong Tang & Martha Shulski & Natalie Umphlett & Tarik Abdel-Monem & Frank E. Uhlarik, 2018. "An examination of midwestern US cities’ preparedness for climate change and extreme hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(2), pages 777-800, November.
    2. Guyadeen, Dave & Henstra, Daniel & Kaup, Shivani & Wright, Grace, 2023. "Evaluating the quality of municipal strategic plans," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Christine Quattro & Thomas Daniels, 2022. "The Constellation of Plans: Toward a New Structure of Comprehensive Plans in US Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Reckien, Diana & Buzasi, Attila & Olazabal, Marta & Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis & Eckersley, Peter & Simoes, Sofia G. & Salvia, Monica & Pietrapertosa, Filomena & Fokaides, Paris & Goonesekera, Sascha M. , 2023. "Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3, pages 1-14.
    5. Dave Guyadeen & Jason Thistlethwaite & Daniel Henstra, 2019. "Evaluating the quality of municipal climate change plans in Canada," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 121-143, January.
    6. Clemente J. Navarro-Yáñez & María-Jesús Rodríguez-García & María José Guerrero-Mayo, 2020. "Evaluating the Quality of Urban Development Plans Promoted by the European Union: The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 215-237, May.
    7. Stelios Grafakos & Kate Trigg & Mia Landauer & Lorenzo Chelleri & Shobhakar Dhakal, 2019. "Analytical framework to evaluate the level of integration of climate adaptation and mitigation in cities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 87-106, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    strategic planning; strategic management; socio-economic development strategy; assessment of socio-economic development strategies; municipality; municipal strategizing.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:5:p:67-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.