IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlabec/v3y1985i1ps1-32.html

Intercountry Comparisons of Labor Force Trends and of Related Developments: An Overview

Author

Listed:
  • Mincer, Jacob

Abstract

This paper is a survey of analyses of women's labor force growth in 12 industrialized countries, originally presented at the conference in Sussex, England in June 1983. The main focus of the conference papers and of the current survey is on growth of the labor force of married women in the years 1960-1980. Trends in fertility, family mobility, and wages also receive attention as related developments. Married women's labor force growth was observed in all countries,expect for the USSR after 1970, when labor force rates of women reached the level of men. Growth rates differ among countries. They apparently respond to growth in real wages and/or to growth in education, but response elasticities differ among countries. Estimates of these elasticities contained in the country paper were helpful in predicting the trends. Other findings include: Ubiquitous declines in fertility and growth of divorce in the 1970s. Both developments are related to longer ran labor force growth. In all countries wages of women were lower than wages of men.The 1960 average gap of 38% narrowed to 29% in 1980. Factors related to these trends, including public policy, are discussed in the survey.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Mincer, Jacob, 1985. "Intercountry Comparisons of Labor Force Trends and of Related Developments: An Overview," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-32, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:3:y:1985:i:1:p:s1-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0734-306X%28198501%293%3A1%3CS1%3AICOLFT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers. See http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JOLE for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:3:y:1985:i:1:p:s1-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JOLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.