IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-736754.html

On the Feasibility, Costs, and Benefits of an Immediate Phasedown of Coal for US Electricity Generation

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen P. Holland
  • Matthew J. Kotchen
  • Erin T. Mansur
  • Andrew J. Yates

Abstract

In this study, we examine the feasibility of immediately phasing down US coal-generated electricity given the existing fleet of power plants. We take consumption as given and evaluate how prioritizing natural gas generation over that of coal would change emissions and operating costs. To do this, we develop a replacement algorithm based on transmission regions and marginal cost comparisons. We find that between 66% and 94% of coal generation could be replaced immediately, reducing electricity sector CO2 emissions between 18% and 29%—equivalent to between 5% and 8% of total US energy-related emissions. The cost range is between $49 and $92 per ton of CO2, where benefit-cost ratios are favorable in some scenarios considering local pollutant cobenefits alone. Despite the command-and-control nature of prioritizing natural gas generation, we find it relatively cost-effective even in comparison to a Pigouvian tax.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen P. Holland & Matthew J. Kotchen & Erin T. Mansur & Andrew J. Yates, 2026. "On the Feasibility, Costs, and Benefits of an Immediate Phasedown of Coal for US Electricity Generation," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(1), pages 77-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/736754
    DOI: 10.1086/736754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736754
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/736754
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/736754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/736754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.