IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-715885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory Induced Risk Aversion in Coal Contracting at US Power Plants: Implications for Environmental Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Akshaya Jha

Abstract

Seminal work argues that electric utilities sign long-term contracts with coal suppliers prior to making relationship-specific investments in order to avoid the possibility of ex post hold-up. This paper provides empirical evidence that risk aversion also plays an important role in the coal contracting behavior of US power plants. Specifically, I show that plants facing more spot coal price uncertainty sign longer duration coal contracts, purchase contract coal from a larger number of origin counties, and pay higher contract coal prices. One plausible mechanism for this risk aversion is that regulators are less likely to incorporate high input cost realizations into the regulated output price they set for electric utilities. Using my estimate of plant-level risk aversion, I calculate that the ratio of the aggregate costs incurred by plants under cap and trade relative to a carbon tax is 1.27. This highlights the importance of implementing climate policy that limits carbon price volatility.

Suggested Citation

  • Akshaya Jha, 2022. "Regulatory Induced Risk Aversion in Coal Contracting at US Power Plants: Implications for Environmental Policy," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(1), pages 51-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/715885
    DOI: 10.1086/715885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/715885
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/715885
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/715885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/715885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.