IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jaerec/doi10.1086-700721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Welfare Analysis of Conservation Easement Tax Credits

Author

Listed:
  • James Vercammen

Abstract

The use of conservation easements to protect vulnerable land is growing rapidly, but there is growing public concern about the social cost of easement tax credit programs that promote the use of easements. Landowners who agree to an easement sell or donate their development rights to a conservation agency and receive a tax credit on the "gifted" amount. The tax credit is intended to reduce underinvestment in land preservation by conservation agencies that operate with tight budgets. Using a model that combines asymmetric information and real options, this paper shows that the tax credit program is least effective for land with the highest environment value and, for a sufficiently high value, may decrease rather than increase the probability of an easement outcome. The failure of the conservation agency to internalize the land's development value can result in the agency agreeing to accept a welfare-worsening donated easement.

Suggested Citation

  • James Vercammen, 2019. "A Welfare Analysis of Conservation Easement Tax Credits," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(1), pages 43-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/700721
    DOI: 10.1086/700721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/700721
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/700721
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/700721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruiqing Miao & Hongli Feng & David A. Hennessy & Gaurav Arora & Charles R. Loesch, 2023. "Grassland easement acquisition: Conversion hazard rate, additionality, spatial spillover, and heuristics," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 928-946, June.
    2. James Vercammen, 2019. "A dynamic analysis of cost‐share agri‐environmental programs," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 67(1), pages 15-30, March.
    3. Ruiqing Miao & David A. Hennessy & Hongli Feng, 2022. "Grassland easement evaluation and acquisition with uncertain conversion and conservation returns," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(1), pages 41-61, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/700721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JAERE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.