IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-742538.html

Cheating Your Way to Losing: Perceptions of the Use of Weight Loss Medication

Author

Listed:
  • Pooja Somasundaram
  • Kelly L. Haws

Abstract

Consumers frequently make judgments about others’ health-related behaviors. Yet the rise of the GLP-1 weight loss industry has sent these judgments into overdrive. Three studies demonstrate that consumers who lose weight using GLP-1 medications are perceived as less moral than those who lose weight through traditional means like diet and exercise. These judgments arise because GLP-1 users are viewed as exerting less effort and taking a less fair approach, with fairness serving as the moral lens through which effort is evaluated. Further, these perceptions decrease observers’ intentions to seek referrals for or recommend GLP-1 use to others. Importantly, these inferences are malleable: signaling concurrent effort, particularly through following restrictive diets, can reduce moral scrutiny and improve social evaluations. Together, our findings highlight the reputational costs associated with GLP-1 use and demonstrate how visible signals of effort can help individuals manage the moral judgments that accompany stigmatized self-improvement methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Pooja Somasundaram & Kelly L. Haws, 2026. "Cheating Your Way to Losing: Perceptions of the Use of Weight Loss Medication," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(4), pages 397-412.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/742538
    DOI: 10.1086/742538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742538
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742538
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/742538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/742538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.