IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-742483.html

Not Worth My Sweat: Food Equivalents of Calorie Expenditure Dampen the Perceived Value of Exercise

Author

Listed:
  • Jiajia Liu
  • Phyliss Jia Gai

Abstract

Consumers are increasingly focused on their health and fitness, investing in fitness products and frequently tracking their calorie expenditure after physical activities. This research investigates how presenting calorie expenditure in terms of food equivalents (e.g., a run that burns the calories of a fried drumstick) impacts the perceived value of exercise, compared to presenting calorie expenditure as mere numbers. Across five experiments, including a longitudinal field experiment, we find that framing calorie expenditure with food equivalents reduces the perceived value of exercise, lowers intentions to purchase fitness products, and decreases exercise intensity. The adverse effects of food-equivalent framing attenuate when the food portion better meets expectations and when consumers possess greater knowledge of food calories. These findings expand the understanding of consumer perceptions of calorie information, exercise motivation, and demand for fitness products.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiajia Liu & Phyliss Jia Gai, 2026. "Not Worth My Sweat: Food Equivalents of Calorie Expenditure Dampen the Perceived Value of Exercise," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(4), pages 425-439.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/742483
    DOI: 10.1086/742483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742483
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742483
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/742483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/742483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.