IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-742481.html

“My Body, Not Me”: Distancing the Body to Cope and the Objectual Body Schema

Author

Listed:
  • Niklas Woermann
  • Verena E. Wieser

Abstract

This study explores how consumers purposefully distance their body to acquire an objectual body schema and restore fluent coping. Prior research frames body distancing either as response to misalignments between identity and body materiality or as an involuntary experience of the ”dys-appearing” body. In contrast, this study conceptualizes distancing as a deliberate, embodied practice that mobilizes an objectual body schema when holistic coping fails. Drawing on a video-aided ethnography of skiing, we identify three distancing practices: decoupling (“my body, not me”), particularizing (“this part of my body”), and mirroring (“the body twin”). These practices purposefully modulate embodied attention and can be fostered through pedagogic instruction. We contribute by reconceptualizing body distancing as a practical resource for restoring fluent coping rather than a symbolic or pathological response, extending body schema theory through the distinction between holistic and objectual body schema, and advancing learning theory through conceptualizing maladaptive sedimentation of motor routines.

Suggested Citation

  • Niklas Woermann & Verena E. Wieser, 2026. "“My Body, Not Me”: Distancing the Body to Cope and the Objectual Body Schema," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 11(4), pages 370-382.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/742481
    DOI: 10.1086/742481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742481
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/742481
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/742481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/742481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.